this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
260 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19490 readers
3574 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 17 points 36 minutes ago

“It is imperative that we provide President Trump with every resource necessary to correct the disastrous course set by the Biden administration,” Ogles said in a statement

so Biden created a bad situation for him in 4 years, yet he thinks Trump needs 8 years to undo it. Sounds like a skill issue to me.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 31 minutes ago

Good job guys, you saved Palestine!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 47 minutes ago

And there it is..

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 minutes ago

California could be broken into 66 Wyoming-sized states.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It's cute how so many in the comments think the legal checks will prevent this. They don't care about the law or the Constitution in the same way they don't care about optics, hypocrisy, decorum, or process. People keep viewing this through the lense of American democracy. None of that matters to fascists.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 30 minutes ago

Yeah, people don't seem to truly understand this, and I fear it will take something extreme before they do... And it's likely already too late now, let alone by then.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

In order for it to pass, they need 290 votes in the House. The Republicans currently have 220 votes, so they would need 70 Democrats to flip.

Then it goes to the Senate where they need 67 votes. First, 60 to get past the inevitable filibuster, and with 53 votes, Republicans need 7 Democrats to flip to move it forward and 14 to pass it.

Then, the fun part, they need 38 states to ratify it. Trump did win 31 states, so he would still need 7 Harris states to ratify an amendment.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 30 minutes ago
[–] [email protected] 38 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Nah. They're just gonna say "whachu gonna do about it" as he sits in the office for the third time. Or the richest men in the world backing the regime will just ~~bri~~ lobby.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 50 minutes ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 39 minutes ago

@HasturInYellow And the one behind him.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 5 hours ago

Me as a Tennessean: "I bet it's Andy Ogles"

Checks

Goddamn can I read that man like a fucking book. I'm sorry we're all trying to vote the bastard out but the State gerrymandered the district because... AND I SHIT YOU NOT... "California does it, so it's okay if we do it too". Honest to God what our State Assembly said about breaking Nashville up into a hellscape of gerrymandering.

Do know, he's an idiot IRL as well. He's the kind that's really full of himself and he's got a super high self-worth in head.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 hours ago

Standard traitor shit.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

FTA" "Trump “has proven himself to be the only figure in modern history capable of reversing our nation’s decay and restoring America to greatness, and he must be given the time necessary to accomplish that goal,”" - He hasn't don't anything yet!! How has he 'proven himself'

[–] [email protected] 2 points 27 minutes ago

good lord...

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

He's proven that he's a fascist and demented psycho, so that's good enough for republicans.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Surely we would all actually show up to try to fight this, right? If it passed.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Absolutely. People talk about another civil war. If you start hear ing about spontaneous violence in the streets, that's when you need to worry. I think if this actually passed, we'd start hearing about stuff like that.

Realistically, Republicans know this has no chance of passing. Frankly, I think this is just mean-spirited trolling--which is a good indicator of the state of our politics. We want to see the other side suffer.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 minutes ago

It's the fascist version of all the pie-in-the-sky progressive stuff that gets introduced when they know they can't get the votes. I wish more of them actually gave a shit about the American people as much as optics and pandering so they can keep sucking the megadonor teat.

[–] [email protected] 139 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

It’s impressive how hard these people lick boots.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

But also how shameless they are, doing it in full public view

[–] DemandtheOxfordComma 21 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 hours ago

Well if the heritage Foundation is going to follow the book of revelation, he needs to be there for 7.5 years.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 7 hours ago

On one hand: called it. On the other: fuck.

[–] [email protected] 92 points 9 hours ago (5 children)

Good fucking luck with that hurdle.

They need a two-thirds vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate; or a conventio called by Congress at the request of two-thirds of the state legislatures. Then it has to be ratified by the legislatures of three-quarters of the states.

Even if they managed a super majority on both sides of Congress for Trumplefuck, there's no way they're getting 38 States to agree to that.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 hours ago

Trump is ruling by executive order and no one is stopping him from doing any of it, constitutional or not.
He'll just issue an executive order to lower the threshold and at best that order gets challenged and goes to the SCOTUS, and we all know what will happen there.

[–] Kecessa 14 points 6 hours ago

Trump is the candidate during next election

Red States let him be an option even though they shouldn't

He wins enough red States to have a majority

They name him president even though it's against the Constitution

The supreme Court is packed with his picks so they don't do anything about it

Tada! Civil war? Dissolution of the USA? Who knows!?!

[–] [email protected] 49 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

It's sad that you guys still think the rule of the constitution is some massive roadblock that they've somehow missed. They literally made an Executive Order that just says "No" to the very first sentence of the 14th amendment, do you think none of them noticed? They get to have a vote about ludicrous things, and they get to gleefully destroy the lives of any Republican who dares vote against them. Maybe it gets struck down for the time being? Who cares, the courts are packed, they can realistically just start killing people pretty soon and it'll start with the disloyals and the true believers as needed as it always does.

You cannot logical trap nor get off on technicalities fascists. It does not matter to them, they will just do what they want anyways, all that matters is if they can crush anyone who tries to stop them.

They are pushing the boundaries of the conversation and they are testing the waters, and every time they're pushed back on they use the limp push back to consolidate more power because nobody has been willing to actually stop them.

[–] [email protected] 73 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

I don't think the law is a restricting factor for the trump regime.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 9 hours ago (8 children)

Imagine the Dems brought Obama back

[–] [email protected] 34 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than three times, nor be elected to any additional term after being elected to two consecutive terms...

Obama served 2 consecutive terms so would be ineligible. They literally wrote this so that only Trump would be eligible.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 25 minutes ago

So fucking petty and childish.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 hours ago

Even in their fantasies they're scared of Obama.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›