this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
157 points (98.8% liked)

politics

21652 readers
3981 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 81 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Amazing how the party of small government, who said Obama ruled by fiat like a despot, is immediately acting how they claimed Obama did.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 month ago (3 children)

What's amazing is that - once again - we've got a Republican President stepping in to drive out every moderate and liberal holding a position of authority in the administration. And Democrats are just shaking their heads saying "Well, but you can't do that" for the fourth time in as many decades, when you quite obviously can.

"Haha! Now we'll get Trump on being a hypocrite!" is the mating cry of a bunch of fucking losers.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago (4 children)

And the next Democratic president will keep 75% of the partisan hacks Trump installs "because we don't want to be divisive".

See Louis DeJoy, who is still fucking there!

[–] earphone843 10 points 1 month ago

Bold of you to assume there will be another democratic president.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Oh but I couldn't do anything about it!" is the modern Democratic battle cry.

Just look at the fucking Gaza Genocide. Biden dithers for 13 months on a deal that's nearly identical to the one Trump inevitably prompted. Trump immediately gets what he wants by putting the slightest pressure on Netanyahu, because he recognizes that this conflict is holding up initiatives his party wants (namely Saudi recognition of Israel into the Middle Eastern trading cartels).

All those people screaming about how "Trump Will Be Worse! You stupid Palestinian Midwesterners deserve the genocide your families will get for not supporting Haris!" and the bombs stop the day Trump takes office. How are these people going to respond to the next Democrat who runs for office, I wonder?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Trump immediately gets what he wants by putting the slightest pressure on Netanyahu

It's been 13 months. Netanyahu has achieved his war aims. He's conceding nothing. Trump is just taking credit for nothing.

this conflict is holding up initiatives his party wants (namely Saudi recognition of Israel into the Middle Eastern trading cartels)

The Saudis and the Israelis are already in a de facto alliance, since both are opposed for their own reasons to the emergence of Arab democracy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I wouldn't be surprised if Biden was OK with killing off the Post Office. He was certainly no friend of Social Security when he was a legislator.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If Democrats don't pull the same shit in reverse (unless the GOP pulls their usual bullshit of changing the rules on their way out the door) then they literally don't give a fuck and are officially a pretend opposition party.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They won't because they're controlled opposition. A release valve for people to flock to when the GOP grows too difficult to render palatable to the public at-large. Dem Leadership simply waits to absorb discontent. They don't function as an organized party.

The only role they do fill is to cast dispersion on any kind of third-party coalition building.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

They're the good cops.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

If you want an opposition, organize one or join one. But if you think that'll be the Democrats, I'm sorry to tell you, that's not what they are. They'll still be trying to split the different right to the death camps.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It’s called projection, it’s all they know.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

They also know gaslight and obstruct.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I don't even know if it was projection at that point. More likely they were just being obstinate. These guys only see one thing and that is power and ways to get it. It's no wonder everything they do looks like projection because the moment they figure something out the accuse others of it and start planning on doing it themselves.

If the system somehow checked itself when Obama was making EO's they certainly wouldn't be trying it now.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

Tyranny = Gender is a spectrum

Freedom = You're male or female and that can never be changed!

[–] mindbleach 1 points 1 month ago

Their stated ideals are ad-hoc justifications.

All that has ever mattered is ingroup loyalty.

They think that's all you're doing, because they think that's all there is.

[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He’s following Project 2025 to a T. It’s a shame most of the electorate can’t read.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do not confuse their bigotry for illiteracy.

They want to control and punish "the other". They don't care that Project 2025 wrote this out. They don't care that it makes them racists or Nazis. They want to punish those different from them.

They want this.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

He's not ... that literally incorrect.

The average American has the literacy ability of a 5th or 6th grader.

MAGAs are of course bigots as well, but the American electorate is also largely, functionally illiterate.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago

a new memo obtained by CNN Wednesday told public health agencies to have all documents and communications — including regulations, guidance, notices, social media, websites and press releases — approved by a presidential appointee.

Very on brand for republicans to have lawmakers stand between health officials and those they are serving.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago (3 children)

This is what people voted him in for and people who didn’t vote figured Harris would be the same.

America’s got to work on its education system and fix this problem but of course conservatives want to gut that too.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago (2 children)

People figured Harris would be the same because that's how the media played it.
They really pushed the "both sides" bullshit to keep the race close and ratings up. Now they're about to lose their editorial freedom for it. There's gonna be some fat leopards soon.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

But quarterly profits will be great.

The line went up.

And boards will just hire new CEOs to suck up to Trump and get by.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The media sells what we as the population want to buy.

It doesn’t exist in a vacuum.

[–] earphone843 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lol, the media sells what the billionaires tell them to sell.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It wouldn't matter if no one paid attention to it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah, people always say that, but advertising and propaganda work.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

I think you mean, conservatives have already gutted education. They're currently attempting to make the final killing blow (defund public education to pay for christo-fascist private education).

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Project 2025 is a lot of work.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't even think we've hit the Project 2025 stuff yet...

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 month ago

This is exactly what they defined for phase 1 of project 2025. Clear out the experts heading the regulatory departments, then start micromanaging the IC workers.

Next will be firing the ICs that aren’t producing stuff that’s good for Trump donors or isn’t good for republican propaganda.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago (4 children)

So how long before something like a no confidence action or something can be taken to stop this? He's speedrunning turning the US into a madhouse and I know the VP would be next in line but... Something? Anything more legitimate than just fighting fire with fire by various groups being uncooperative?

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The US doesn't have a mechanism for a no confidence vote, the only thing we have is impeachment, and that won't happen while the Republicans own the House and Senate.

You need a 218 vote majority to impeach in the House, Republicans hold a 220 vote majority there.

Then you need a 67 vote majority in the Senate to convict and remove him, Republicans hold 53/100 seats there.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It could happen if republican members of the house and senate weren't such cowards/ ghouls/ shills that would rather help a fascist stay in power than admit their party is wrong.

[–] earphone843 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So, in other words it'll never happen.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

It'll never happen through the formal system.

[–] gravitas_deficiency 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I’m more and more convinced by the day that this isn’t going to end without at least some level of political violence

[–] earphone843 11 points 1 month ago

They're not going to let it end without it. In fact, they want it so they can use it as an excuse to double down on the fascism.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's historically the only way fascism ends.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Not always. In Spain, it fizzled out after Franco died and the king brokered a deal to return to democracy. The transition was difficult, the Spanish right was never really purged of its fascists, but Spanish civil society now is quite vibrant.

In Portugal, the rule of the fascist junta of generals ended with a non-violent people-power revolution.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

It will. It's been inevitable for awhile now, because there are two different United States that cannot coexist with each other. When two groups of humans with radically different ideals are forced to share territory, violence is the inevitable outcome.

The U.S. is already at a low level of violence, and has been since Trump emboldened right-wing stochastic terrorism in 2016. It will only escalate now that Trump's brownshirts have been released from jail with a mandate to attack Trump's enemies.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago

General strike. All the money flows because we make it flow.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

You're asking this as if the majority of congress isn't fully behind the Trumpist authoritarian agenda.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The time for that has passed. This is the end game.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Civil servants: tangle them up in procedure, practice malicious compliance, leak, and if necessary, undermine. Don't enable mob rule.