this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
924 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19490 readers
3333 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Representative Sarah McBride, the first out trans congresswoman, criticized Donald Trump’s executive order defining gender as strictly male or female.

McBride points out that biologically all embryos develop as female until the SRY gene activates weeks after conception.

The order, which ties gender to reproductive cells at conception, unintentionally categorizes all humans as female from conception based on biological facts.

McBride’s remarks highlight scientific flaws in the policy.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Does this make him officially the first woman president? So progressive.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 minutes ago

If it's retroactive, then we haven't had a single male president.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

The president Donald Trump is the president with more women in their cabinet ever.

Dude is literally drowning in pussy

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 minutes ago

So far, only one cabinet member has been confirmed by the Senate, Marco Rubio for Secretary of State...

So I guess you're still not wrong. ;)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago

I wish, that'd be a hell of a headline.

"Muffled at Last, Serial Snapper Grabber Snatched to Death"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I feel like an invulnerable Goddess, in my sleep Trump tried to turn me into a man. I went Ultra Instinct and slapped that shit without waking up, and when I finally do get up I find that the whole country is one giant lesbian slumber party.

This shit aint nothing to me ma'am, Madame President could suck my gock if I wasn't post-op.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 hours ago

I KNEW IT!

I'M A LESBIAN!!!!!

I've known my whole life and it's a relief to FINALLY to be able to come out officially.

THANK YOU PRESIDENT RUMP!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Haha this is so awesome, she should tell that one to a trans person being denied healthcare.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 minutes ago

VOTE BLUE NO MATTER WHO, because they're all hilarious, woahfully ineffective at combatting conservatives and the far right, but hilarious.

[–] [email protected] 83 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

I think the bigger issue is hiding in plain sight:

a person belonging, at conception

Personhood does not begin at conception.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 51 minutes ago (1 children)

And if it legally does, since I'm a chimera, can I use the carpool lane?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 39 minutes ago (1 children)

You should apply for a second birth certificate, on the grounds that both of the "people" who were conceived were actually born. You should seek a second SSN, claim them as a dependent on your taxes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 27 minutes ago

That would be an interesting approach to how to deal with me being trans. "Actually you only issued my brother his birth certificate, I'm the sister, here's the proof I was born"

[–] [email protected] 44 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

We all know that's why the mistake was made. It's not exactly rocket surgery.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 17 hours ago

It’s a P2025 script. Oklahoma made it into law into September, with the same ridiculous misunderstanding of basic biology. It doesn’t matter, they know who they are supposed to oppress.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 18 hours ago

The Vatican has entered the chat

[–] kablammy 49 points 20 hours ago

At least McBride can now use the women's restrooms in the Capitol. And so must all the other politicians!

[–] [email protected] 203 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

Anyone who thinks this shit is funny is in for a rude awakening.

They do not fucking care. They will use this the exact same way that they would have used it if it was worded correctly.

You don't get out on technicalities in fascism; if the autocrat in charge wants to do the thing, he will do it. All of these things will be used as cudgels against perceived political enemies, and marginalized US citizens.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

They do not fucking care. They will use this the exact same way that they would have used it if it was worded correctly.

The reason why this is good news is that the more bizarrely worded the order, the easier it is to get it throw out in court, America even now runs on the WORD of the law, not the intent.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

America even now runs on the WORD of the law, not the intent.

Yeah except not really. Have you paid attention to recent SCOTUS decisions? They aren't even bothering to make cogent arguments in some cases, and hearing others that never should have standing in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I want people to try to be less pesimistic, the point is that technicalities like this will waste time. Every one of these exectuive orders is going to be challanged in court, and while the GOP controls the higher courts, these cases will start in the lower ones. With any luck, the lower courts will stay the order until things can get resolved. Every appeal, every challange takes time to process and judges are under no obligation to resolve things quickly.

The goal currently isnt to try and overturn the order, thats just pissing into the wind. The goal is to waste their time for 2 years and hope the house flips, if it does, we can send 47 back to his golf course for the rest of his term because he wont be able to accomplish anything.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

we can send 47 back to his golf course for the rest of his term because he wont be able to accomplish anything.

I mean I was kinda hoping agent 47 would be incredibly busy this term. I can imagine a level set inside the inauguration with the dinner and all that.

[–] chad 4 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

The goal is to waste their time for 2 years and hope the house flips, if it does, we can send 47 back to his golf course for the rest of his term because he wont be able to accomplish anything.

And then we'll have Couch Fucker McGoo as president.

(not intending to kink shame)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

I'm into weird TF porn, so now I'm thinking about being turned into a woman/couch hybrid, it's kinda hot ngl.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Nobody likes Vance. He'd be a completely ineffectual president. Which is preferable in my opinion.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

25th Amendment

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I'm, not sure about that. vance is probably a lot more likely to be worn as a sock puppet. drumpf will at least give them a hard time everytime he doesn't want to do something.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Yeah, I'd rather have a puppet Vance than a party completely kowtowed by a rapist felon.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago

Man, I'm tired of people calling realism "pessimism." It's kind of a huge problem actually when you think about it.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 20 hours ago

The Senate flipping is also a very real possibility in 2026. There are 22 Republican seats up for grabs and only 13 Democratic ones.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 195 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (15 children)

Theres two possible interpretations due to the at conception bit I think. Either he made everyone a woman, or he abolished gender all together. Either way this EO make Trump the single largest gender changer in history as he just changed the gender of either ~150 million or ~300 million people.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 131 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I'm not sure what is more disconcerting. That the people in charge truly are a bunch of fucking idiots.

Or that those idiots have outplayed and outsmarted the Democrats at damn near every turn for 20+ years.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Trump: "You must identify with the gender you were at the time of conception."

Science: "Everyone starts out as women and don't become men until 6 weeks after conception."

Trump: "That is exactly what I meant. Everyone who knows science must identify as a girly girl."

[–] [email protected] 19 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Trump decided he wanted to be the first female president obviously. Don't you liberals understand 5d chess!?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 20 hours ago

"Trump beat Hilary to being the first woman president" is honestly hilarious to me. Sad, but also hilarious.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 18 hours ago

He literally just wants to be the first female president

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Donvict and his supporters (yeah, I know, don't blame the precious voters!) don't really understand science.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 20 hours ago

Someone should sue JD Vance for addressing Trump as Mr. President. Illegally addressing him as a man. Clearly sewing doubt in the direct orders of the president, it's detrimental to the entire country.

[–] [email protected] 112 points 1 day ago (21 children)
load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›