this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
133 points (96.5% liked)

Lord of the memes

8881 readers
121 users here now

The Lord of the rings memes communitiy on Lemmy. Share memes about Lord of the rings and be respectful.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Are those supposed to be twin lamps? I can't make out what the left picture is at all.

[–] ArbitraryValue 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

They're supposed to be the Two Trees from the Silmarillion.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Ah ok. I'm guessing the trees are after the lamps? Are they on the elf island?

I know the creation stuff, but not that much after it.

[–] ArbitraryValue 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah. I'm not sure why, from a narrative perspective, Tolkien choose to have Melkor destroy the world's source of light (the lamps) and then have Melkor destroy the world's source of light (the trees this time) again. I think it's already clear that he's the Dark Lord after the first time he does it, but maybe there's some additional symbolism that I missed.

[–] phdepressed 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What is destroyed can be brought back but not in the same way. Destruction is not the end even though things won't be the same after, probably a world wars reference of sorts.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not everything needs to have deep/real-world meaning. As i recall, Tolkien really didn't like people ascribing such things to his writing. They're just stories and should be treated as such.

[–] phdepressed 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's true but stories come from somewhere and people are allowed their own interpretations (within reason). Once something is out in the world you can't control how other people perceive it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Absolutely, but calling it a reference implies that it was intentional by the writer, which seems unlikely considering what he's said about such things.