this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
116 points (96.0% liked)

Lord of the memes

8331 readers
819 users here now

The Lord of the rings memes communitiy on Lemmy. Share memes about Lord of the rings and be respectful.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Are those supposed to be twin lamps? I can't make out what the left picture is at all.

[–] ArbitraryValue 11 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

They're supposed to be the Two Trees from the Silmarillion.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Ah ok. I'm guessing the trees are after the lamps? Are they on the elf island?

I know the creation stuff, but not that much after it.

[–] ArbitraryValue 7 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah. I'm not sure why, from a narrative perspective, Tolkien choose to have Melkor destroy the world's source of light (the lamps) and then have Melkor destroy the world's source of light (the trees this time) again. I think it's already clear that he's the Dark Lord after the first time he does it, but maybe there's some additional symbolism that I missed.

[–] phdepressed 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

What is destroyed can be brought back but not in the same way. Destruction is not the end even though things won't be the same after, probably a world wars reference of sorts.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Not everything needs to have deep/real-world meaning. As i recall, Tolkien really didn't like people ascribing such things to his writing. They're just stories and should be treated as such.

[–] phdepressed 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

That's true but stories come from somewhere and people are allowed their own interpretations (within reason). Once something is out in the world you can't control how other people perceive it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago

Absolutely, but calling it a reference implies that it was intentional by the writer, which seems unlikely considering what he's said about such things.