this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2025
174 points (93.5% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5461 readers
395 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Sky Australia dont even try to hide that they are pushing the murdock agenda

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

She argues as honestly as any tankie.

[–] [email protected] 80 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This really is a master class in how to handle hostile news media

[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 days ago

Plus the perfect example for how the MSM, especially right-wing Murdoch rags, are nothing but psychological warfare to manufacture consent for the plutocracy.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The big lie she tried to repeat is that NEW fossil plants are cheaper than renewables. In 2019, in US, new FF peaker (cheapest) plants cost over $1/watt, while solar was under $1/watt. FF plants have operating and fuel costs. Solar panels have since dropped 20c/watt since then.

The Australian market has the most developed home solar costs/penetration in the world. It is successful because utility, largely legacy, power is expensive/extortionist. AUS wholesale electricity market averages between 11c to 20c per kwh.

$1/w solar provides a 3% yield/year at under 2c/kwh in AUS for 30 years, which has very high solar production capacity. LFP batteries, now down to 10c/watt also has a 30 year lifespan at 4 hours storage, and is 3% yield at 1c/kwh discharge - charge margin.

6% interest rates means 6c/kwh from solar and 3c/kwh from batteries pays for project with full leverage. Free money at just 10c/kwh revenue. Winfalls at higher revenue rates. Actual solar costs are below $1/watt and interest rates below 6%, and what needs to improve.

As for jobs, new energy is jobs. Adding x gw of solar per year is permanent jobs even if there is little operating staff. Growing x each year is permanent job increases every year.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Australia is amazing for solar. I wish Canada would step up and fix our damn regulations. It’s insanely more expensive to install household rooftop solar here vs Australia. I’m so jealous!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Cost is entirely based on monopoly utility power, and their power to refuse connection. Australia does have a good 40%+ solar production advantage over Canada though, but Canada does have "net pricing" which banks long summer surpluses for winter.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They do not care about facts. The suffering is the point.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

It's either sadism or greed with the right. Flip a coin.

It's probably more greed in this context though.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 3 days ago (2 children)

News hosts should ask critical questions. It's not their job to try and "win" a debate. She could have said "thank you for your insight" and be done.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

Ideally, they should ask critical questions. But this host's job (that is, the labor they are being paid to perform) isn't to serve society as a news host. It's to disseminate corporate propaganda on behalf of the network major shareholders. It was their job to try and "win" that argument (it's not even a debate!) and they sure didn't.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It is their job to protect big oil tho lol.

[–] earphone843 9 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 37 points 3 days ago

He got his message accross. Despite attempts to hinder it. Nice.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sky News is Murdoch rag trying to be Fox.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago

Fox

The other Murdoch rag.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 days ago

I love that she was so willing to repeatedly interrupt him and say shit that made her look insane and/or unqualified to have an intelligent conversation.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)

She was so much more civil than any host I've ever seen on Fox News or talk radio in the US though. I appreciate they didn't pick someone less articulate to interview as well.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There was so much respect and dignity here I don't know what to say. I'm not used to this. They play Fox News in the bars here

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Jesus Christ American media is in bad shape that you think this is journalistic integrity.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

You are picking a fight with the wrong people

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 days ago

My word she is a patronising arsehole

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

So unprofessional.