this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
443 points (94.0% liked)

politics

18651 readers
3594 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 81 points 1 year ago (9 children)

I mean... It's one letter off.

[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Can we refer to Trump as "that rigger guy" from now on?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i’d honestly like to remember it but i also don’t want to say it. not only is it racist, it’s fucking stupid.

like the people that say libtards or magats, we get it. you don’t wike the bad peeepow. you godda caw dem bawd names so you can feew gewd.

this is just a more fucking racist version of the stupidest childish playground tacitics of name calling that both sides of the isles’ idiots can’t help but say.

that being said, gravy seals and meal team 6 are great and hilarious. it’s just stupid shit like democRAT. oh ho ho! it’s got rat in it? MY FUCKING FIVE YEAR-OLD NIECE COMES UP WITH MORE CREATIVE INSULTS.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Rats are lovely and kinder to their own than we are.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I just don't know why he doesn't just come out and say it. Who does he think he's fooling?

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Brought to you by the "let's go Brandon" people.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

It's about pissing us off and making us waste time explaining how they're being shitty

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

He wouldn't lose a single supporter. Probably gain a ton.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

a perfect letter

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Eh ... I'm not convinced.

We have an inexhaustible supply of real and unambiguous crimes and other offenses that we can pin on him.

I think it unnecessarily muddies the water to even bother with something this ambiguous.

The guy is on trial for RICO charges, and in all likelihood will see seeing a 5-year prison sentence for ORGANIZED CRIME in trying to overthrow a lawful election.

Let's just keep talking about that. And these fact that we have it on tape that he was asking the Georgia Secretary of State to "find" exactly the number of votes Trump needed to overturn the election he lost.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah I agree. trump is racist AF, we don't need to strain and stretch to make him racist even in the event that he isn't being 100% racist.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't have any faith that he'll see a jail cell. I wish I could be like you.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The RICO charge carries a mandatory 5 years that can't be pardoned and can't be paroled. And RICO is stunningly easy to get a conviction on. It was built to catch mob bosses who directed activity but didn't get their hands dirty.

Until the RICO charge, I didn't think he'd see prison either... but now... looks pretty good.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Hah I thought it was for those that rigged (allegedly (falsely)) the election. A group of riggers. Who rig.

How naive of me. This is worse

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I caught on to the use of "riggers" when I noticed it was only black election workers that they were going after.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m not sure Trump is bright enough to use a dog whistle. He’s more of a shoot them in the middle of 5th avenue guy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I hate when people talk like this

The fact that he’s introducing race into this prosecution surprises me, it’s disgusting, it’s textbook Donald Trump, but it comes as no surprise.

So surprise or no?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Beep boop I am a Large Language algorithm" -- 'journalist'

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"I was surprised, but I shouldn't have been."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I read that in Scooby's voice

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Well he ís the only brown character on the show.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

He is racist, but not clever in any way, I think he meant a made up word in his bullshit accusation, I don't think he was trying to be racist here.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Someone else said it and he repeated it, or someone else wrote the tweet. It was absolutely intended to be racist.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yall know rigger is a real word right? Like, I work with a group of people explicitly called riggers. They rig stuff up. Use cranes, chain falls, shit like that?

Trump is using a dogwhistle though.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Yeah it’s also a common term in the bdsm community for people who like tying people up. But he definitely isn’t referring to them.

Some people don’t get the benefit of the doubt when it comes to dog whistles.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They accuse one side of “They want to take your pickup truck. They want to rebuild your home. They want to take away your hamburgers.” - while on the other side, they themselves want to take nothing serious, just your freedom and democracy,

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or your kids. Or your medicine

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

He’s obviously racist AF, but I doubt this is a dog whistle. Guy is too fucking stupid and impulsive to attribute some kind of intent to his word vomit.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago (10 children)

He's stupid in a lot of ways, but he's popular as a speaker for a reason, and he has done a lot of dog whistling in his life. This is just the most blatant. I do think it is intentional.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

He's popular as a speaker because he "tells it like it is", which roughly translates to "he says the quiet racist parts out loud". I agree that this probably isn't a dog whistle. Or, it probably wasn't. It definitely is now, and I fully anticipate seeing someone wearing a shirt that colorfully uses the word "rigger".

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

This is where I’m at. He makes up stupid fucking words all the time. But those that follow him will absolutely run with it to “own the libs.” I’m not even sure they would’ve picked up on it if it were a dog whistle. Maybe in the context of the rest of the trial it reads that way, but I haven’t been following the shit coming out of his mouth. But strictly because there’s been a big deal made of it, it’s now ripe for those dimwits utilizing it “as a joke,” and then it’ll just turn into another in a long list of things that IS a dog whistle with some modicum of deniability

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

he’s popular as a speaker for a reason

I think he has a natural talent to listen to what gets a rise out of people, what gets a reaction, and then copy that in his own way. What he says, once transcribed to written form, is often not very intelligent. It's his mannerism and even his unique makeup and hair - that people listen to far more than his actual meaning. I find people who think Trump is a great person often have serious difficulty interpreting and understanding hard sciences like chemistry and physics... and are influenced by advertising techniques in particular ways.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

Must just be a big coincidence his supporters started posting this kinda shit afterwards. 'Dindo Riggers' could mean anything!

[–] mrpants 6 points 1 year ago

Doesn't take too high of an IQ to come up with this dog whistle.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Stop giving him the benefit of the doubt.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

I live in a very protected part of the world. I once thought the N word was "No", and that was why people hated it so much.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Ya know, the first time I read that I thought an aide must have swapped his N and R keys. But I was just making a little joke about it.

load more comments
view more: next ›