this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2024
32 points (90.0% liked)

Stable Diffusion Art

1782 readers
46 users here now

Share art created with Stable Diffusion

Also see:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
32
Speed Pioneer (image.civitai.com)
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

(NiOut) (2024)

Image description: A painting of a red racing car, speeding through a cloud of dust and debris on a dark, dusty road. The driver is wearing a helmet and is barely visible through the dust cloud.

Full Generation Parameters:

masterpiece, hyper realism, a high-resolution photograph, golden ratio, dutch angle, dynamic, side view, Rocket Red

Steps: 33, Sampler: euler_beta, Seed: 94364613076775, VAE: ae.safetensors, Model: flux_dev.safetensors, Copyright: © 2024 NiOut, Model hash: 4610115bb0, Lora_0 Model hash: 379e73dccf, Lora_0 Model name: flux_realism_lora.safetensors, Lora_0 Strength clip: 1, Lora_0 Strength model: 1

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

New Lemmy Post: Speed Pioneer (https://lemmyverse.link/lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/33832437)
Tagging: #StableDiffusion #AIArt

(Replying in the OP of this thread (NOT THIS BOT!) will appear as a comment in the lemmy discussion.)

I am a FOSS bot. Check my README: https://github.com/db0/lemmy-tagginator/blob/main/README.md

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Why does an image generated from an AI trained on other people's stolen copyrighted work, in itself copyrighted?

[–] merde 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

are you an artist? are you working on, or with, ai? are you a lawyer?

where does this comment come from and why do you feel the need to add this comment under a prompt based image?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Read the full generation parameters you fucking dolt

masterpiece, hyper realism, a high-resolution photograph, golden ratio, dutch angle, dynamic, side view, Rocket Red`

Steps: 33, Sampler: euler_beta, Seed: 94364613076775, VAE: ae.safetensors, Model: flux_dev.safetensors, Copyright: © 2024 NiOut, Model hash: 4610115bb0, Lora_0 Model hash: 379e73dccf, Lora_0 Model name: flux_realism_lora.safetensors, Lora_0 Strength clip: 1, Lora_0 Strength model: 1

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It might be related to the code and not the output.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 days ago

Since it doesn't mention either, you have to assume it's intended for both.

[–] merde 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

the prompt has nothing to do with my question. I am questioning your comment.

with the way things are, there surely will come a day when people can copyright their prompts. Why do YOU care, you fucking dolt?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Apologies, I will address the first comments questions: no, yes, no, because the generating prompt has a copyright for no reason I can discern and should be omitted and looks unnecessarily/impotently litigious.

You cannot copyright a fucking prompt, but you could sure as fuck try, but it will fail because that shit would not hold in any court of law otherwise companies could copyright: a fucking cooking recipe, a fucking figure of speech, a fucking vulgar word, a fucking random sequence of words, your dad's slut-name during his weekly peggings, etc.

[–] merde 2 points 1 day ago

You cannot copyright a fucking prompt, but you could sure as fuck try, but it will fai…

☞ "there surely will come a day when people can copyright their prompts"

every song is made of words, like prompts too are, yet nobody today (again ☞ today) argues that they're not copyrightable. You can make a song with a "random sequence of words" and if a year later, let's say, Taylor Swift makes another song with the same random sequence of words, I'm sure you won't still be claiming : oh, it was just a random sequence of words.