(NiOut) (2024)
Image description: A painting of a red racing car, speeding through a cloud of dust and debris on a dark, dusty road. The driver is wearing a helmet and is barely visible through the dust cloud.
Full Generation Parameters:
masterpiece, hyper realism, a high-resolution photograph, golden ratio, dutch angle, dynamic, side view, Rocket Red
Steps: 33, Sampler: euler_beta, Seed: 94364613076775, VAE: ae.safetensors, Model: flux_dev.safetensors, Copyright: © 2024 NiOut, Model hash: 4610115bb0, Lora_0 Model hash: 379e73dccf, Lora_0 Model name: flux_realism_lora.safetensors, Lora_0 Strength clip: 1, Lora_0 Strength model: 1
the prompt has nothing to do with my question. I am questioning your comment.
with the way things are, there surely will come a day when people can copyright their prompts. Why do YOU care, you fucking dolt?
Apologies, I will address the first comments questions: no, yes, no, because the generating prompt has a copyright for no reason I can discern and should be omitted and looks unnecessarily/impotently litigious.
You cannot copyright a fucking prompt, but you could sure as fuck try, but it will fail because that shit would not hold in any court of law otherwise companies could copyright: a fucking cooking recipe, a fucking figure of speech, a fucking vulgar word, a fucking random sequence of words, your dad's slut-name during his weekly peggings, etc.
☞ "there surely will come a day when people can copyright their prompts"
every song is made of words, like prompts too are, yet nobody today (again ☞ today) argues that they're not copyrightable. You can make a song with a "random sequence of words" and if a year later, let's say, Taylor Swift makes another song with the same random sequence of words, I'm sure you won't still be claiming : oh, it was just a random sequence of words.