(NiOut) (2024)
Image description: A painting of a red racing car, speeding through a cloud of dust and debris on a dark, dusty road. The driver is wearing a helmet and is barely visible through the dust cloud.
Full Generation Parameters:
masterpiece, hyper realism, a high-resolution photograph, golden ratio, dutch angle, dynamic, side view, Rocket Red
Steps: 33, Sampler: euler_beta, Seed: 94364613076775, VAE: ae.safetensors, Model: flux_dev.safetensors, Copyright: © 2024 NiOut, Model hash: 4610115bb0, Lora_0 Model hash: 379e73dccf, Lora_0 Model name: flux_realism_lora.safetensors, Lora_0 Strength clip: 1, Lora_0 Strength model: 1
Sounds like you don't know... So here you go:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2023/08/08/is-generative-ai-stealing-from-artists/
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/infinite-scroll/is-ai-art-stealing-from-artists
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/lists-artists-artificial-intelligence-art-generator-180983546/
https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/visual-artists-fight-back-ai-companies-repurposing-work-rcna102760
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-62788725
https://www.forbes.com/sites/danidiplacido/2023/12/30/ai-generated-art-was-a-mistake-and-heres-why/
https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2023/08/is-art-generated-by-artificial-intelligence-real-art/
copying isn't stealing, which seems to be the premise of these pieces, but AI doesn't copy, anyway. it uses a predictive model to approximate responses.