this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
86 points (97.8% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27225 readers
2169 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What does it take in terms of assets, abilities, and/or income for you to consider them wealthy?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

I think calling Bezos rich is an understatement. My mind cannot comprehend the amount of wealth he has.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Nobody wants to give a hard number?

I’ll say six million dollars earning ~5%/year. That’s $300k/yr before taxes. Assuming long-term investments, that’s 15% gains tax, so take $45k for taxes (fed), no idea what state will be because they’re all different, so just round it down to $250k year income in your pocket.

$250k/yr isn’t a lot of money…(I can hear the wtf’s…just hang on)…out of that has to come all your expenses including medical insurance in the US, your mortgage, car payments, etc.

This is not “fuck you” money. This is living an upper middle class lifestyle. You’ll have nice cars but not crazy nice. A decent house but not a mansion. You can tweak it a little this way or that depending on the CoL of where you live, but not a lot. Yeah, you can earn more in interest, but I was being conservative.

You’re rich because you don’t have to lift a finger to enjoy it, and you have the time to enjoy it.

Want closer to fuck you money with the above conditions? Try $20 million in the investments at 5%. That’ll get you a million a year before tax.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I agree my threshold is a bit lower and roughly comes out as getting 100k a year before tax so $2m.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 22 hours ago

Everyone is going to have different lifestyle wants. My low number might be too low for many, they might think living more lavishly would be more “rich”. I figured my numbers are adequate to live a moderate lifestyle and have no serious money worries. No Ferraris, of course, but a top trim level Honda no problem or a good BMW with some budgeting.

The real luxury is not having to work.

[–] Mnemnosyne 3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Which kind of rich do you mean? The 'this person is truly wealthy but it's not unreasonable' or 'this person is unacceptably rich and should have their money taken away if not worse'?

The former can be somewhere around....$10,000,000 or so. Lower the older the person is really (cause I consider rich versus remaining expected lifespan), so maybe even as low as $6,000,000 for someone who's currently 40.

The latter where it's simply unacceptable for people to have that much I'd start the cutoff around $400,000,000 or so.

And slight sidenote on the unacceptable levels: Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos both are so unacceptably wealthy that they could make one person a day wealthy by my $10,000,000 standard...every day...for 100 years...before running out (and that's assuming they stopped accruing money at the beginning of this)...and still be unacceptably wealthy to a crazy degree.

Oh and all my numbers are assuming no additional income and definitely no interest or investment (but also assuming the money remains the same value it has today).

[–] neidu3 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I guess what would it take for you to look at yourself and conclude that you're rich?

[–] Mnemnosyne 1 points 21 hours ago

For me, given my age and all...five million.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

If literally running around in a warehouse full of 20 dollar bills collecting all you can with your hands and unlimited bags makes less money, there's no fucking way your actual work is producing so much value.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago

Wealthy and rich have nothing to do with one another.

Wealthy is a person that lives in a stable environment, where they aren't threatened with death on a regular basis (such as, losing one's job).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Wealth is anything beyond having the necessities of life covered.

If you can afford a reasonable home, your bills, food, any dependents, eating out once a week, hobbies, taking a holiday or two per year, and contributing to your retirement then you're living comfortably.

Anything beyond that is wealth, it allows you to splash out on luxury products, luxury holidays etc.

Some people may never realise they're wealthy because they live excessively and believe that's the norm, ie payments for an overpriced car, spending excessively on hobbies etc

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

not having to work and still get to live comfortably and afford most of the things you desire

[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 days ago (5 children)

When you could stop working and just coast off of what you've got till you die. At that point, making more is a luxury.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

So you don’t think people should ever be able to retire?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I think people should have luxury, just not to the extent that it starts hurting society as a while. Like with Jeff Bezos's behaviour.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

There’s an enormous gap between grandma living month to month on her pension cheque and Jeff Bezos money. Grandma doesn’t work though so you could say she’s “coasting” even if she relies on the senior discount at the grocery store to get by.

There’s also a lot of people who have a lot of wealth (in the form of land, buildings, equipment) yet can’t afford to stop working, such as farmers. The UK government is going after these folks aggressively and they’re very unhappy. We could be seeing a strike by farmers in the new year where they simply stop delivering food to market.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Yep, Bezos is hurting a lot of people in his pursuit of wealth though. Granda gets to enjoy her extra time in her way.

And yep, some people have plenty of assets to work with. But that doesn't make you wealthy per se. You provided some good examples of that.

They're not wealthy. At least not in the way I consider wealth, which was the question.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I’m confused. Here was your original comment:

When you could stop working and just coast off of what you've got till you die. At that point, making more is a luxury.

That, to me, includes grandmas who live off their pension cheque as “coasting off what you’ve got.” Did you not intend for that interpretation?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

I do, building up a pension over your life is a luxury I think people deserve. I do count those grandma's as wealthy. But that doesn't mean it's a bad thing, I think people should be able to retire.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

That’s a really good answer, wealth comes with options

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 104 points 2 days ago (21 children)

Of course, rich is a relative descriptor, like tall or heavy, some people are richer than others.

I would call anyone who doesn't need to work in order to live (i.e. who can live off investments and interest) rich.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is apt, because I know people who earn six figures but work 60 hours a week and are living paycheck to paycheck. They're not poor, but they're not rich.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 days ago

A 6 figure salary while living in midwestern USA or elsewhere with low CoL is very different from living in most areas along the coast.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I would call anyone who doesn't need to work in order to live (i.e. who can live off investments and interest) rich.

Some caveats I would add: (1) Excluding receivers of pensions and/or other benefits.
(2) Without moving to a different country. I could retire today, if I moved to a low cost of living country.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago

For (2), in that country, you would be rich.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago

If you could retire and have enough to keep you comfortably housed and insured until you're 90, that's wealth enough.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 days ago

For me, being wealthy would mean that if they never intentionally earned another penny for the rest of their life, that would not prevent them from doing anything that they wanted to do within reason.

For normal people that would mean between two and five million dollars in liquid assets available to them.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 days ago (2 children)

There are two thresholds that matter: "rich" is where you no longer have to really think much about money on a day to day basis, and "wealthy" is where you no longer have to work for a living. Both thresholds depend on your expenses and the lifestyle you're looking for, I guess

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago

I was about to type something very similar, but switching words. “Wealthy” to me implies having enough wealth to not really worry. “Rich” makes me think of Lamborghinis and yachts and mountains of cocaine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago

I liked it back when the aristocracy was just called the "leisure" class. At least they didn't spend their time playing at being an executive and pretending they earned what they have.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Being able to not worry about food, gas, standard bills and actually have something in savings

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's sad that affording basic necessities and having a bit of a financial cushion is considered rich.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

It is indeed. Everyone I personally know is struggling and hoping for better days while working a ton.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

My definition for myself to be rich is:

I have enough money that I can pay someone(s) yearly wage to manipulate my wealth into enough money to cover their salary and then some.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Someone who has everything they could possibly need and no bad debt. Does not need to be rich.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

If you can basically do whatever you want and the cost is of little to no concern, you're rich.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Eh I'll adjust that a bit to "and you're not required to work 40 hours a week to do so". If you are living well and still working, then I'd still say congrats, but that's not rich, that's supposed to be the top end of middle class. (If it is anymore, well, who knows).

The big kicker is if tomorrow they lay you off, are you nervous or worried? Not rich then, the rich would shrug it off and take a few months or years off doing whatever they like. If your first thought when you get laid off is "how long will my savings last" or "I need to find another job", congrats! Not rich.

But if you don't need to work (or you're someone like a board member or executive who shows up for 10 hours a week and claim they "work", then no, your rich, you have enough were you don't have to work anymore.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Personally, I'd consider myself rich. I live in Germany which is already among the richer countries in the world giving me access to an insane amount of infrastructure and opportunities. Furthermore, I work for an IT company and make more money than average and more than I need to satisfy my immediate needs (shelter, food, transportation etc.) and pay for my hobbies (mostly outdoor stuff). I might not be a millionaire and I can't just retire tomorrow but still I'm very aware of what a huge privilege I have compared to a vast part of humanity.

Personally, I think already my taxes are too low. Not to start about millionaires or billionaires.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Access to a warm fire to dance around, food and libations, and friends to share them with.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Second house is immediately qualifying.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

$5 million of spare money. Not net total wealth but actually $5 million investable dollars.

At that point, I'd you stick that money in a very conservative and safe brokerage account allocation, 5% return per year is $250k. That is a higher salary than almost anyone needs, meaning you can live very comfortably without working. You can't buy a yacht but you can be "done" and so can your children and their children if they aren't stupid.

If you choose to work, then you can just reinvest that $250k and let compound interest do its thing and get richer. Lucky you.

[–] Ajen 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you can't afford a yacht on $250k/year (after tax) then you need help budgeting, or it's just not a priority. You might not be able to afford multiple houses AND a yacht, but a normal house and a yacht should be possible. Or your could replace the yacht with a couple lambos...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Not really the point, but sure, whatever.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Anyone who can forego any form of future income and live off their current wealth for the rest of their life in relative luxury/comfort.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

The tiers for me are: Doesn't worry about money -> Doesn't work -> Can afford a US senator to protect money. There are not titles for this kind of thing.

load more comments
view more: next ›