this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
594 points (96.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

6016 readers
2827 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Before I got my glasses the stars looked big and well star shaped, with lots of little spikes, I was utterly disappointed when I got my glasses, looked at the night sky and they're just dots, boring ass dots.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 weeks ago

Go out into nature, far far from civilization and light pollution. It's a very different picture.

[–] Mouselemming 12 points 2 weeks ago

Oh I had the same experience with my friend's hair. I used to like being behind her in line because her hair was like a flowing, floaty cloud. When I first wore glasses, I could see each hair and it became like a tangle of wires.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You should try looking up at the stars with night vision some day. It's spectacular.

...Or so I've heard. I'm one of the poors that can't afford unfilmed gen III white phosphor tubes.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Just mine your own phosphor at home

[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (7 children)

Wtf is that event name? That is possibly the most convoluted way to write "disability awareness day".

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The convoluted one puts an emphasis on a person, not on a disability. I am aware of my disability always, I don't need a special day for it. A day to recognize me might be nice however. That sort of logic.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I am aware of my personhood always, and don’t need any special emphasis on it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Well, that could change of if we as a society decide to define you as some characteristic you posess.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

They had to find something between #DayOfRememberanceOfThoseWithDifferingAbilities and #CrippleDay.

But yeah, it does seem off.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

"Persons With Differing Abilities" is just a few steps down the euphemism treadmill from where we are now. Give it twenty years.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

"Handicapable Day"

[–] pancakes 8 points 2 weeks ago

I work in an accessibility-focused field and can say person-first verbiage is more important for those with visible/ serious conditions that society tends to focus on over them as a person.

The spirit is that you view them as a person, instead of a their condition. It might seem obvious, but imagine you have a very visible physical disability. People are always talking about your condition, asking you about it, it's the first thing people focus on when they meet you. As a person, you don't want your condition to define who you are. As an example, if you worked really hard to win a major award, would you prefer the headline "First Name Last Name Wins Award", or "Severely Autistic Person Wins Award"?

It's fairly nuanced, and within some groups (such as ASD) there is actually pushback against person-first. But then there's people that it really helps so it's more of a "just be chill and not a dick about things" kind of vibe. Kind of like pronouns where some people make a huge fuss whenever they're mentioned. In reality, it's more about just treating people with respect as well as not walking on eggshells around everyone.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

DAD is a much better acronym.

[–] ayyy 3 points 2 weeks ago

But I have to have a way to look down on people who are sympathetic to my cause but aren’t serially online. How else will everyone know I’m more compassionate than you?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think it stems from a movement to stop identifying people first by their disability. I think along the lines of the difference between "Here's a disabled person" or "Here's a person who happens to have a disability." Lots of people would rather be first identified as a person.

Shrug.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The idea that an adjective being literally first in a phrase, determining what a person “is identified as” first, is ridiculous.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Agreed, that's just a quirk of English. Not a problem in Spanish.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Vivo en los estados unidos y veo el adjectivo primero con frequencia.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Because that's how English is, you describe a thing before you say what it is. Doesn't make much sense!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

It's literally the same logic that led to "people of color", just applied to having a disability.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Was there really not a shorter title than Day of Persons With Disabilities?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago

"Spaz day" wouldn't get the right message across, I suppose.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

DisabledDay is a no go aparrently

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Leg disabled day is the one we always skip. Thankfully Roy has us covered.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

And miss the chance of that amazing acronym that just rolls of the tongue?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Guess we're crying on the toilet today

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

The company is nice

[–] Ghyste 4 points 2 weeks ago

That's a daily routine.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I’ll be that guy… in reality, an Axolotl and a Chameleon aren’t going to be hanging out and looking at the night sky. Axolotls live under water and can spend short periods of time outside of the water. Chameleons live above water and spend almost no time under water. These two animals live in environments that are inherently exclusive to one another.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe they're star crossed lovers

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I like how you had to dive into those specifics to see this was unrealistic, and both of them speaking and understanding English is completely looked over.

Talking animals? Fine! But damned if two from different habits are hanging out! Suspension of disbelief broken!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Anthropomorphism is substantially more common than aquatic animals comfortably living on land.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Anthropomorphism is attributing human traits to non-humans. Maybe the axolotl has the human trait of being just fine on land. That's why both are sitting like humans.

There, I fixed it for you. You can now enjoy the comic.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Haha, I respect where you are coming from with that.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

It's a cute comic dude.

No one is asking you to be that guy. No one cares.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, that's what makes it such a fun Hallmark ~~fish~~ axolotl-out-of-water movie! Duh...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They had a vision? What was it?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

That one day, the new Dragon Age game would be extremely purple.