this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
37 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19156 readers
2610 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

Really glad people are tackling these issues now that it's officially too fucking late to do anything about them. Good work!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 hours ago

Our newspapers are owned by Trump loving billionaires so they sanewashed the fuck out of him

"Trump is proposing a 100% tariff on all imports from China, BUT Kamala wants to increase taxes on anyone who makes over $10M!!!"

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

This outlet of PBS actually did the opposite and minimized the effects of tariffs in a hit piece they did on Harris after the debate.

Researchers at the Peterson Institute for International Economics estimate such import taxes would cost the average family $1,700 a year.

I mean, maybe? But just the word average is a red flag whenever it shows up in economic statistics. It's also ignoring the larger risk of recession/depression as well as lost wages. During the steel tariffs the average family didn't see a big increase in cost of goods, but it did affect job growth in those sectors, caused layoffs, etc.

https://www.houstonpublicmedia.org/npr/2024/08/25/g-s1-19480/12-misleading-or-lacking-in-context-claims-from-harris-dnc-speech/

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

They had a horse race to run.

Because they are "objective" and "both sides"...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Parts of Texas are fairly blue (mostly the southern half). If dems would push to split Texas into multiple states, they’d get more electoral college seats. And these new states would get better representation.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

If Trump really does remove large parts of government and raises the tariffs that way, things are going to get interesting in the Houston area. A

I’m wondering if the people behind him really do want to do all this or if he is full of hot air. I doubt, for all his bluster he that independent. If they want to do this, then it must be a deliberate decision to paralyze the country for some reason. Why, I have no clue.

I guess we find out in January and February what so many of our futures will be

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

I'm going to make sure I call it a "donvict tax" and call it "donvictflation" whenever I'm within earshot of redhats or suspected redhats.