Free speech though right?
this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
162 points (98.2% liked)
politics
19156 readers
2550 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Honestly, the journalists who normalized Trump for the last 4 years are responsible for the mess they're about to be in. Refusing to ask Trump hard questions while making Biden and Harris answer for every rumor pushed by the right.
I won't say I'm glad to see it happening, because an attack on journalism and the press is horrifying and carries some huge future implications, but I won't deny that I feel a bit of schadenfreude about it.
"Leopards will never eat my face"
He won't be prosecuting Murdoch press
He'll be prosecuting meidestouch. The only fortunate thing is that most of their journalists are also lawyers
On a side note, Meidas was second most popular you tube channel beaten out by a musician (Meidas moved up 6 spots to #2, Fox dropped to 4th)
actually going to use the Constitution
if we're gonna go there. let's get rid of the current incoming administration, because it shouldn't have even been on the ballot to begin with.
and while we're there, lets get rid of all the guns, everywhere, that aren't used by the states' 'well-regulated' militias for their defense (hint: their national guards fill that role today, along with the rest of the military forces).
and while we're rolling, we're gonna revoke tax-exempt status for every church that has advocated directly or indirectly for a candidate or ballot vote from the pulpit or with the assistance of their tax-exempt funds or assets (and we're seizing those assets, too, to help cover their tax fraud).
I will never support disarming the working class and the oppressed. The church stuff sounds nice though.
What if we disarmed the police at the same time?
Yeah democracy isn't gonna survive this chief. At least not for the 4 years he is in. We might be able to recover afterwards but thats a stretch as disinformation will only get worse. Sucks.
Only if Blue States don't resist and just go along with it.
looks at Hochul and Adams
Yeah we're fucked
I'm betting on Adams doing a quid pro quo and lift NYC's sanctuary city status if trump tells the DoJ to drop charges against Adams.
I knew Adams was a crook when I heard that he was a former cop. Not even surprised.
The fact that the establishment Dems happily supported Adams is an embarrassment.
Because we have a piece of shit, billionaire supporting, neoliberal party and a bat shit insane far right fascist party as our only "viable" choices in any election. It's no surprise the majority of one party are a bunch of garbage people and the entirety of the other are raging assholes.
"Democracy" in America is a fucking joke.
First Amendment is deadddddddd
But I thought Second Amendment protects the first 🤔
Where those folks at?
Busy surrendering their third amendment rights of course.
Quartering of soldiers?
Yeah. Been violated a handful of times (eg: during LA riots) but there are almost no court cases about it
No that's too useful. It will be dead in practice when it's aimed at non-Reich wing media, but it will be touted by the SCOTUS as cornerstone of our dumbocracy when it's applicable to protecting that same Reich wing media.
We'll just continue to live in the same world of a multi tiered mockery of a "justice" system. They just don't need to be quiet about it anymore, they learned they can literally do whatever the fuck they want and nothing will happen to them.
So are the ones who were supposed to defend it.
o sweet mothe' fuck. they're still going on about 2020 elections.
lets closely examine this year's first, including everything that transpired before election day.