this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2024
27 points (86.5% liked)

Futurology

1886 readers
14 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lurch 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Ironic, as a quantum leap is the smallest possible change 😄

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

I think that would be a planck leap. lol

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Year 2044: Yellow powder that was used to combat carbon emission has given the entire Earth cancer. People are encouraged to wear masks and goggles until a cure is discovered.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Some researchers say have found an anti-powder to combat the original, it could be a 'quantum leap' for earth.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

2112 anti yellow powder powder is collecting in the food chain and causing massive ecological destruction. People are adviced against eating until a cure is discovered.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think exploring carbon capture, and funding smaller projects is fine but I don't accept the oil industry using it as an excuse to keep doing what they're doing and hamper transitions to renewables.

We will still need oil/fossil fuel for some fuel applications, lubricants and some plastics. But it can be far, far less than what we use today, and like smoking, it's being propped up by these companies and some international governments.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Companies: “We can pollute with reckless abandon now? Okay!”

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Is there anything tumeric can't do?!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Plants are many other of magnitude better than this.
Consider this result they got (and how expensive it must be) :

from :
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08080-x

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yes, Rock Stored Carbon is less impactful compared to say Land Stored Carbon (Biomass burial, Paulownia, Bamboo)

Good thing there are people working on all different Carbon Capture methods.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

huh ? Jup Rock ? ... is this chalk ?
(we do know most carbon on Earth is stored in rocks ... maybe we could call them carbonate rocks ?)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

If i took a small step for every world changing quantum leap that gets reported in the media id have circled the earth by now to witness how it barely made a difference.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I do like carbon capture as an idea, I just hate that it's being seen as a cop-out by (mostly) conservative politicians.

I love the idea of carbon-capture soap especially. Think I'll try getting a bar or two when I run out of the handsoap bars I currently have.