this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
233 points (99.6% liked)

World News

39142 readers
2669 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

But, 16 years (after the 2008 crisis), some experts believe new risks are emerging. And this time, they are linked to highly indebted companies backed by private equity firms, which are part of the growing but opaque portion of the financial system known as the shadow banking sector. Shadow banking refers to financial firms that face little to no regulation compared with traditional lenders, and includes businesses such as hedge funds, private credit and private equity funds.

While the use of securitisation dipped in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, as a result of a tarnished reputation and regulatory backlash, its popularity has subsequently risen. Today, the global securitisation market covers about £4.7tn of assets, according to estimates by analysts at RBC Capital.

In this public market, bundled loans are rated by credit rating agencies and sold on to a broad range of investors, and their terms, structure and sales are openly disclosed. These are the routes typically taken by traditional banks, which face far more stringent regulation. The remaining £120bn is made up of securitised loans bundled up by the shadow banking sector. Private securities are sold directly to a limited pool of sophisticated investors. They are less regulated, need not be reviewed by ratings agencies, and are far more opaque.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Quickily, let's remove more regulations to avoid this!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

take some low risk loans and package them together to increase yield

trade packages with investors and banks

put those packages into huge CDOs, then make CDOs of CDOs, then essentially gamble on the value of said CDOs

morbillion dollars achieved

run out of low risk loans to package

Yolo, let's just put all the loans in, what could possibly go wrong lol

8% of the poor plebs go delinquent on their predatory loans

2008 financial crash

lobby congress to bail you out so you get paid, tell everyone it was the fault of immigrants and poor people

repeat

[–] [email protected] 78 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Savings banks that hold the money of normal people need to be split off from investment banks. So they can collapse and not use these savings as collateral for their risky behavior.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This used to be the law in the US. It was stupidly undone during the Clinton administration.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass–Steagall_legislation

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago

Sorry dude, but they aren’t back. They aren’t back because they never left.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 days ago

Whoever's writing this timeline is just like, "C'mon, guillotine the billionaires already!"

[–] Kecessa 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

GME stock owners be like "Yeah, we have been talking about that shit for years now!"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Explain in some detail as to how this is connected.

[–] Kecessa 5 points 1 day ago

Just saying that these guys have been going crazy trying to find all the cracks in the system and have been talking about all the systemic risks for years at this point. It's not related to GME in particular, it's just that this crowd of retail investors are extremely interested in anything that could point to a potential market collapse and they are ahead of financial news sites for many of these things.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

tl;dr is that when the GameStop squeeze didn't occur, loads of those traders got really into market mechanics, fiscal policy, and activism.

I still sign their petitions, but I've had the passion for it beaten out of me over the years. Markets are, I believe, unfair by design, and this economic system is functioning exactly as intended.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

I'm sure Tim Pool, former Occupy Wall Street spokesperson, is very upset about this.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

I wonder what excuse the people who voted for Trump because of "the economy" will come up with next time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This article depicts my worries very well.