this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
170 points (87.6% liked)

Showerthoughts

29793 readers
736 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

'Choose' rhymes with 'lose'? I mean c'mon, someone did that shit on purpose πŸ‘€

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

Read rhymes with lead, and read rhymes with lead, but lead doesn't rhyme with read and lead doesn't rhyme with read.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 days ago

They never did. Their spelling, meaning, and pronunciation are the same as they have always been.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 days ago

I mean yeah 'loose' could probably be pronounced like 'choose' and it would still make sense, but it absolutely wouldnt make sense for 'lose' to be pronounced like 'moose' or 'goose'. Im not sure what you even mean when you say they switched meanings either because thats just false.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (47 children)

The bigger problem is that lose should rhyme with pose or close. Loose is fine.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Don't get me started on ough and ead.

The lead soldier kneaded dough in the bough brush while they read the book that they previously read while taking a furlough in the rough.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago

I read this and all I could think of was "Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

How can the soldier knead anything if they're made of lead?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (46 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

It's a lose/loose situation

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Wait, if they swapped meanings and then swapped spellings then doesn't that mean they're the same as before?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Grrr! English strikes again!

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago

english is a very silly language that's evolved so you can do almost anything with it

it's a risky strat but it seems to have worked

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (5 children)

Loose rhymes with noose. I can't think of a word that's spelled and pronounced like lose so you have me there.

choose lose cruise booze

all rhyme lol

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

May as well combine words with the same pronunciation into one word and call it Simplified English (/s)

Honestly tho, this is one of the features of Simplified Chinese, which created the infamous "fuck vegetables" (干菜类).

It's meant to say "dried vegetables" (乾菜鑞 in TC), but δΉΎβ†’εΉ². Meanwhile, there exists εΉΉβ†’εΉ² as well, which means "fuck".

fuck vegetables

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

they are very different in my mind. perhaps because i first came across them in their respective contexts through reading.

even when speaking, to me, lose rhymes with booze and loose rhymes with goose.

this has never been a problem for me, personally.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)

And here's me, another non-native speaker, just learning that booze doesn't rhyme with goose.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

oh, no, no, no! booze and a goose should never go together!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago

They didn't, except among the ignorant and autocorrect.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago (6 children)

It's a miracle I know it, and having to teach someone how to read and spell was an eye opener for me trying to explain "this is like this except for this one word because... Reasons and sometimes there's a variation like this because...reasons" so many times.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

Agreed, I am teaching my second son to read.

I am having the same conversations as when I taught my first to read.

"ok, this word is a 'sight word' because it doesn't make the sounds you expect. It says won, but it looks like it says on-e"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Mostly the "reasons" just boil down to etymology. We spell things the way the languages we stole them from spelled them.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

English is idiosyncratic as hell. Didn’t someone famous call it β€œnot a language but 3 languages in an overcoat.”

Adding to this specific instance is that even native speakers spell things wrong. They loose their keys, etc.

[–] can 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What about the words that are only different in tone.

Content and content

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It is read like lead, not read like lead.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Noel_Skum 6 points 4 days ago (7 children)

Are you familiar with β€œThe Chaos” by Gerard Nolst TrenitΓ©?

Deep breath:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Chaos

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I believe the generally accepted scientific term for the English language is "clusterfuck".

[–] Noel_Skum 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There's ~~too~~ ~~to~~ two different ways to pronounce and spell many words.

Fuck, that's three!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Steady up over ~~their~~ ~~they're~~ there.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

Trust me, it is equally frustrating for most Americans...or almost, anyway.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Yeah it should be looz / loose

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If we start now, we can probably switch the pronunciations of Aristotle and chipotle within a generation.

Chip-ot-el

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

Okay TIL that these aren't pronounced the same.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί