Whaaaaaat? The rapist also approves of rapists? The close to 80 year old man who bragged about grabbing women by the pussy also prefers the company of men who see women as objects to be grabbed? Why are we pretending to be shocked? He’s shit and he’ll be shit until he dies, hopefully McDonalds does its job sooner or later
this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
244 points (96.2% liked)
News
23406 readers
3117 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I read that as “Trump defiles”
Also true
It's not like he has much choice. Sane, reasonable people aren't exactly raising their hands at this point and the only people clamoring for roles are batshit quasi-politicians who have similar contempt for any institution that has a basis formed in reality but wildly different agendas
Edit: dunno why you downvoted me. Honestly, who else do you think would take these positions? Pence? Kelly? Barr? Mattis? Haley? Christie? Tillerson? Milley? Bolton? Scaramucci? Cohen? DeVos? Chao? Grisham? ... Bueller? Dude's a fucking joke. Take the wooden spatula and start scraping that barrel out because there's absolutely nothing but sludge
Oh please "saner" people than dr fuckin oz are a possibility
And those saner people handed Trump Thune instead of Scott via blind vote. They know what's up. Like I said, sane people do not want to be in his administration. They want to babysit his administration. Nothing good comes from befriending that guy and everyone on Earth who doesn't believe in hurricane machines knows that, even GOP.
Practically the only people who are around Trump are riding his coattails for their own reasons and they have no qualms about it
Saner than Oz and willing to work with Trump?
I find that hard to believe.
They're obviously being picked for their deviceveness. Not really sure what the endgame is other than to spread fear, anger, and uncertainty. Some strategists is coming up with these picks for some reason.
It's a way for him to test people's loyalty. Anyone who doesn't vote to confirm his insane picks is going to be ousted by the rest of the party.
deviceveness
Deviousness? It's what autocorrect suggested the moment I started typing the word.
Based on the context, I think they meant "divisiveness", but "deviousness" probably also describes the nominations well.
I I misspelled it, it should have been divisiveness, "a tendency to provoke dissension or discord"
deviousness, "The characteristic of being devious; sneakiness; underhandedness."
Wait wait -
Trump thinks it’s “I was credibly accused of sexual assault! #MeToo”
Remember: a plurality of voters reinstated him, knowing fully that he has been found guilty of sexual assault in a civil case and that he openly wishes to fuck his own daughter. This is the guy who grabs women by the pussy. Why would he give a shit about women?
This abomination is brought to you by your compatriots.
So it took this guy 7 years to figure out that Trump is just as bad as all the other Hollywood rapists, and he has the audacity to present this to us as though that knowledge is breaking news in the year 2024?
And these people wonder why their industry is being replaced by podcasts.
? This is about his cabinet picks.
That venn diagram is quickly becoming a circle.
Oh my god now way…
I think he asked, 'Who do we have with a rape investigation? Let's go with them!" to demonstrate his misogyny to the cult.
