A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
Do this all over the world, just kill airbnb and other such similar sites by taxing them out of existence
Obviously the same 32 million tourists won't come if the same overnight accommodation isn't available and the rest are looking at higher hotel costs due to saturation
It's the right thing to do to serve the local residents housing needs. But the local residents also need the tourist as many work in hospitality / leisure etc
Will be interesting to see what happens
Call me jaded, but I don't think tourism is such a great thing to base your economy on.
It depends.
If you rely only on tourism, you're commuting to a low wage economy. However, some cities have used tourism as the base economy to springboard to high value industries as the tourism amenities end up getting used by high earning locals.
Even if they raise hotel prices 50%, they'll still be cheaper than hotels in other massive cities. If people don't mind paying $300/night in Paris or London, they'll be okay with paying $150-200/night in Barcelona.
that's not how it works. tourism is elastic to only a small extent. the rest is in an equilibrium. barcelona is in constant competition with other spanish cities, portugal, french south coast, italy etc. if barcelona raises hotel prices 50% and nothing else changes, very very many people who were on the fence about their destination and chose barcelona will easily choose the now comparatively cheaper alternatives.
Given that supply is being removed, it is likely that demand will adjust to the new hotel supply.
In markets the typical response to a sudden shortage is an ________ in ______, leading to a reduction in demand, as the demand shifts to alternatives (other destinations, non-consumption) until a new equilibrium is found.
That's right - an increase in pricing reduces demand by pushing people to alternatives, reducing demand.
Cool, but the Barcelona local government isn't increasing prices; they are reducing supply.
That's right, a reduction in supply increases prices.