this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
420 points (82.9% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

165 readers
328 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' etc.

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
420
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

There is no single group of people on the planet Earth as adept at shitting and falling back in it as the Democrats.

They turned "Snatching Defeat from the Jaws of Victory" into an artform.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

This why people think they are a psyop.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 27 minutes ago

I don't need convincing. They showed me in 2016 that they're controlled opposition. Admitted it in court.

Wilding v. DNC Services Corp.

Google it for yourself.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I don't get it. Yeah all of these things are horrible but the other choice is literally Hitler. We could say the same thing about them but we didn't win

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The term "literally Hitler" is a lot less impactful when democrats have been complicit in genocide for an entire year.

If Trump did what Biden did, I have no doubt you would have called him literally Hitler for it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago

Oh I have no doubt since his plan os giving Israel everything they need to massacre every and each Palestinian. At least the Biden administration pretended to care

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Either you are able to vote on harm reduction alone, knowing that your pick isn't ideal...

Or you are so ideologically locked in that nothing but "your brand" is enough.

Harris sucks but the vote was to keep MORE, NEW people from being at risk.

[–] explodicle 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Trump won both times because he departed from GOP ideology, not his voters. Harm reduction doesn't get voters to the polls.

This isn't about you and me. A campaign centered around "stop this person" is just less effective than one centered around "let's start doing this".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Just saying this is a hypothetical reality. As you say, it doesn't get people to the polls.

What it means is folks have to live with a FURTHER candidate because they aren't smart enough to serve their own interests and take the NEARER candidate.

[–] explodicle 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The difference is that expecting the candidate to change was a realistic expectation, while expecting the voters to change was not.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

I disagree, especially on Israel. Change would mean deviation from the official position. Imo it is a weakness with running a candidate who is already in the Whitehouse. They can't just say things, weather or not they want to, if that will have strategic/military implications. An outside candidate is free to say whatever. (To be clear, I don't believe Harris wanted to deviate much)

Lastly, I think my whole point is I'm not expecting anything from anyone, I'm observing how voter's inability to accept a good not great candidate results in a much worse candidate, so inaction results in a even less satisfying outcome.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

This is the second time in a decade that the liberal establishment expected the US voting public to actually do something about all the fascism they themselves don't seem to actually want or can do anything about.

The "Vote Harder!" brigade was warned about this - at one point or the other, "lesser evilism" is going to hit rock-bottom.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

That's fine, my point stands.

If more people need "their brand" then they'll also in the bed they made: the further possible candidate from their brand

[–] [email protected] 17 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Republicans always seem to win with shitty candidates because they understand this intrinsically. They do not care that DJT is an utter buffoon, they care that he will enact the shit they want, and now they're getting it because they refused to stay home. As the saying goes: Democrats want to fall in love, Republicans want to fall in line.

So Republicans backed their guy, just like they did the last two elections, and there was no line that could not be crossed that would convince even a fraction of Republicans to not vote. Meanwhile, virtue signaling lefties desperately tried to convince me for months that I shouldn't vote for Biden OR Harris because they were both equally culpable for a genocide that is happening halfway across the world, as if Trump would have been any better.

Yeah, we absolutely deserve to be punished for this. We let this happen. If Dems could actually get a solid trifecta in the government, we might have a shot at actually reversing some of the damage that has been accumulating since Reagan, but that requires people to set aside their purity tests and hold their noses at the ballot box. The real elitists are the Democratic base who feel personally slighted at the idea of compromise or harm reduction.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

There were 14 Presidents since FDR. And many of the Democratic ones had ample possibility to enact progressive laws and chose not to.

You keep claiming that people like Clinton, Obama, Clinton, Biden or Harris are "left", but they are center-right, in many aspects far right by European standards.

People don't vote "perfect" also not on the left. They vote "this is current issues, who addresses these issues?" Trump pretending to care about working class people helped him. Biden/Harris made a point of alienating everyone that is against genocide, which should be a nobrainer for progressive politics, and also peddling racist messages with bragging about their deportation numbers.

The idea that the center to far right Democrats would actually bring any leftist solution is laughable. They haven proven time and time again, that they are the party of maintaining the neoliberal and imperial status quo.

The solution is to offer a progressive solution against the reactionary solution, so people can rally around your progressive solution. Providing no solution and denying the problems is a surefire way to demotivate and disengage people. Someone who wants genocide, deportations and neoliberal economics can always vote the Republicans. And the Republicans can succesfully further the image of the Democrats being the billionaire cultural elite party, while the Reps are the billionaire "hard working" party, peddling the lie of the American dream. But it can be peddled to Joe and Jose in the milling plant.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

Respectfully, I have to disagree.

How many democratic presidents have had control of all three branches of government? It's easy for Republicans to get shit done because they have the courts essentially in their pocket. If the Dems win the house, senate and presidency, they still have to contend with the openly partisan SCOTUS attempting to obstruct them from passing sweeping reforms that would actually fix things. We're fucked for another generation in that regard.

Also, immigration was the #1 issue at the polls this year, even ahead of economy. There's no way in hell it's a bad strategy to campaign on how good Dems actually are with immigration and border security. If anything, we should have been screaming from every mountaintop about how Trump killed the most comprehensive border security package ever penned by convincing Republican congressmen to oppose it strictly so he could run on the issue. That means the issue is not actually something that Republicans care to solve, despite what they've convinced the American people of.

People who were not motivated or engaged to fight against what could very well be the end of democracy itself certainly won't be motivated by progressive promises, especially knowing that they are very unlikely to be implemented. The people who stayed home this year are the ones to blame for everything that happens next, full stop. We can't even point to the EC as a factor this time. A majority of Americans have bought into fascism.

load more comments
view more: next ›