this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
693 points (98.9% liked)

World News

38968 readers
2506 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Russian official Dmitry Medvedev, a close ally of Vladimir Putin, suggested Donald Trump’s election victory may benefit Russia’s interests in Ukraine, citing Trump’s reluctance to fund “idiotic allies” and “voracious international organizations.”

Although Medvedev stopped short of celebrating, he hinted Trump’s aversion to foreign spending could weaken U.S. support for Ukraine.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky cautiously congratulated Trump, recalling their recent discussion on U.S.-Ukraine cooperation.

Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov maintained a guarded tone, noting the U.S. remains an “unfriendly country” involved in the Ukraine conflict.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 hours ago

Yeah the Orange Sack of Shit is useful to a lot of people.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

A classic that is so relevant now. youtube.com/watch?v=bX3EZCVj2XA

[–] [email protected] 40 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Yeah, they're gloating now. But who knows, maybe Trump will backstab Putin like he backstabs everyone else. Though it's unlikely, since he seems to cower whenever he's near his Daddy Vladdy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

All about money! If there's money for trump then he will sell whatever he can to get that money.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Trump also probably still holds a grudge against Ukraine for not manufacturing/finding dirt on Biden during the last election, or whatever the particulars were.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

And don't forget his impeachment over Ukraine too. He is going to fuck them hard. I really hope Europe can pick up the slack on arms production quickly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 42 minutes ago

Ukraine's chances have certainly taken a hit after this election. I also hope Europe starts producing more arms to back Ukraine. Europe needs to do that now and so much more.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Trump is very unpredictable on Ukraine. He said he will support Ukraine but who knows. But some say he will withdraw support from Taiwan, which is unlikely because he never had good relations with Xi and China. As for Israel-Palestine, we know where stands on that.

For me as non-American, I am more concerned with geopolitics. I wish Trump would provide support to Ukraine. But if he doesn't, at least he will stand against China. I understand many Americans are tired of over twenty years of hawkish foreign policies with corporate and imperialist agenda, but if Trump withdraws from Europe, at least he should pivot towards China. It balances out between complete isolationism and imperialism (I believe on a case by case basis of interventionism as part of just war theory, like the US entry into World War 2 and intervention on Yougoslavia).

[–] [email protected] 55 points 7 hours ago (21 children)

All those lemmy.ml people did their jobs bashing Harris to get trump elected.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

The genocide will continue until moral improves

[–] [email protected] 1 points 58 minutes ago

Stupid people. Not being able to see the less worse side makes them stupid people.

And siding with the side that will bring worse to the table just because you can't handle something that the less worse side does? That also makes them stupid people in terms of general and emotional intelligence.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (5 children)

I have voted blue in every election since Obama McCain, despite not liking a single one of the General election candidates, and I phone banked and primaried for Bernie twice.

I don't blame those who sat out. The only reason I don't is to maximize harm reduction so I can look myself in the mirror. I blame those that voted for Trump for Trump.

We have a center right party and a fascist party, both hypercapitalist. You can scream at democratic socialists like me and other leftists, but in my entire lifetime, we have never had a party platform to enthusiastically vote for, only against the worst of 2 terrible options that embrace economic inequity and are well bribed to do so.

And singling them out as the worst offenders for doing nothing on election day while people voted FOR the fascist has just ensured keeping those that decided to disengage stay disengaged, because the neoliberals that run the Democrat party seem to hate leftists even more than Republicans, and say the same thing every cycle to them.

Because at least Republicans believe in our herp derp "free" market capitalist economy, amirite? I wish that commonality our supposed leftwing party has had with Republicans for ages, but especially since Reagan, would tell you something...

Because a society shouldn't be comfortable with an economy that by design leaves so many of its people "losing" so hard they're dying of exposure on our streets, let alone BOTH of our only 2 political parties that matter. But we aren't a society, just a bunch of rugged individuals at each other's throats fighting for the owner's ever dwindling scraps.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

The fact that liberals are blaming leftists and other liberals for this result instead of the complete and utter failings of the Democratic party this election cycle is mind boggling. Having Biden run for a second term was a huge blunder. Then when he was clearly unfit to run again, they rammed Harris through, even though she already primaried in 2020 and was extremely unpopular. Will the dnc take the blame and change anything though? Absolutely fucking not! They'll blame the voters for being racist or sexist or unmotivated or leftist or dumb or whatever. And people will eat it up, look at these comment sections already

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

Yes this loss lies squarely with the Democratic Party and their failure to produce a candidate that could win. Instead they forced Kamala on us and campaigned on “Trump bad” instead of policies that would benefit ALL Americans. Not just outlier groups they were trying to win, particularly failing to win any meaningful support from Hispanic and Muslim voters.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 hours ago

There was actually a lot of enthusiasm for her. But she didn't change his campaign. She ran it the exact same way. And his campaign was already causing people to disengage. I remember in the spring he was trying to celebrate the economy and his advisors whined to the press that the people didn't agree with him. Did they change that messaging? No they doubled down and told their base they were wrong. Their financial trouble was just Republican propaganda.

Which is insane for a political campaign.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 63 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

Lemmy and the Fediverse as a whole is a microcosm that doesn't make much of a difference one way or the other. We can stab at the tankies all we like, but it wasn't their influence in the Fediverse that caused the result, even if they did manage to hoodwink a few into voting for fake tan man.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 hours ago

It wasn't their influence alone, of course not.

They were just part of the bigger propaganda machine that infiltrated so many social media sites.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 hours ago

Taking a broader perspective, social media and those who manipulate it played a huge role in Trump's win. And Lemmy's part of that, like it or not.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Oh please, 20 million voters that didn't vote wasn't affected by the rantings of a few people on Lemmy or Reddit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago

And Xitter, and Facebook. They have those accounts too.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] [email protected] 135 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

The USA just lost the cold war.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 hours ago

It hasn't been a cold war in Ukraine.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 7 hours ago

I guess the USSR and USA had mutually assured destruction by means other than nuclear

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 70 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

America has abandoned Ukraine and NATO.

Time for Europe to step up.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Europe has already been pulling their weight in Ukraine. Now they'll also have to pick up the slack that they US is about to create.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago

Financially absolutely. We do not have the military industrial complex to replace the armaments that the US has been providing however.

I'm sure Ukraine has been preparing for this eventually but I really fear for them and the medium term consequences for us all if Putin gets his way in this war. :(

[–] [email protected] 44 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Everyone should know about The Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia

That plan from 1997 is literally being implemented before our eyes. And now that trump is in again it will accelerate much faster than it has been (so far with Brexit, Ukraine, trump, partnering w/ Iran, far right in Germany). Next removing US from NATO and driving France and Germany apart.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago

Well that's fucking terrifying. Project 1997.

[–] [email protected] 81 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

RIP Ukraine, Palestine, and Taiwan. It was nice knowing you.

I hope any Jill Stein voters are happy

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago

You can not blame this on Jill Stein voters. Trump kicked Kamala’s ass. Maybe not a landslide but it wasn’t close by any means.

I wouldn’t worry about Taiwan either. Not a chance in hell anyone around trump allows him to abandon them as their microchip factories are vital to literally everything we do in this country.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

The Jill Stein votes wouldnt even make a dent in the staggering votes for the Republicans...

[–] [email protected] 35 points 6 hours ago

Yup, Democrats only win elections when they show up to vote. And Democrats did not show up this year.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 hours ago (6 children)

Where are the other 20million voters that didn’t show?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

At home. Too lazy to do anything.

I was playing Catan online yesterday as the results were coming out, I asked the chat if anyone was from the US. Out of 4 players, 2 where from the us and one didn’t bother to go vote. I was shocked. He didn’t even have a good excuse.

That should tell you everything you need to know.

Trump didn’t win…It’s the people that failed to show up.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Tbf, while liberals realize that we need to change the electoral college system, so long as it is in place, there are a good many states where votes don't actually matter. Either bc >70% of the state will vote blue (Democrats) in which case it is over-kill or similarly red (Republicans) in which case it is under-kill.

Also, remember that some votes remain yet to be counted, bc they were sent in via mail. Mind you, we already know (bc of the electoral college system) that these will not change the outcome of the election - though they will increase the amount of the popular vote, especially since the people that tend to send those in tens to be liberal.

On the other hand, maybe a massive showing up of liberals would have helped if Kamala had won, to show how much more massive the popular vote for her was, in comparison to for Trump? Except... would that really have convinced people who were literally gearing up for an actual civil war (or at least an "event" along those lines - perhaps another January 6th style occurrence) to forestall such? I am not convinced that it would.

Also, some people never got their mailers to use for their mail-in ballots, e.g. that story (was it ever validated?) of the landlord in I want to say California who was caught sending in the mailers for his renters. If all you need is the envelope, that's a security concern, and I would like to know how many people report not ever receiving those envelopes to begin with.

Bc those aren't merely votes that could potentially have gone to Kamala - bc then again, a lot of seniors were voting for Trump so we certainly can't say that all would - and instead some may count double if they were made out to Trump. But possibly a low number, I dunno?

And COVID may have changed the game in terms of how readily people will step outside to vote. Also especially younger people have trouble getting time off their jobs, and lines this year were SUPER long - I mean hours and hours long, and with only rudimentary toilet facilities available. I UNDERSTAND why people would want to use more mail-in votes than having to do that.

But, quite possibly it was simply the Gaza situation that caused people to not be enthused about voting for her? I hope we see some kind of analysis to reveal what the true answer ends up being. In the meantime I wanted to mention the above factors that at least make the situation more complex than your one person did not vote story was able to get into:-).

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 hours ago

And so the blame game has begun. And just like in 2016, Dems will point at everything except themselves. But that's not how democracy works.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Obviously. Trump is a Russian asset, always has been.

Goodbye support to Ukraine, hello to American boots on the ground in Russia

[–] [email protected] 1 points 47 minutes ago

It's probably too soon to expect something like that. Simply withdrawing support is likely to accomplish the same goal, and with far less fuss, plus leaves Russia looking all strong to do it without American help, and also the lowered friction reduces the chances of like another assassination attempt on Trump's life or an attempted upheaval of the entire government.

Anyway, I'm saying that if Russia doesn't absolutely need those boots, then it's better for Russia actually, in the long term, to refuse such aid even if it were offered.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

Jesus Christ that last thought hadn't even entered my head. I can't see Poland or the Baltics putting up with that though.

FML.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 8 hours ago

Realistic headline: Russia finally wins Cold War by installing orange shithead for second time

[–] [email protected] 33 points 7 hours ago

Of course, now that Putins biggest asset is back in place. Remember when Russia took out American agents in Russia, shortly after Trump requested a list of those people from the agencies, which was shortly after a talk with Putin that went without any witnesses?

load more comments
view more: next ›