this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
286 points (80.3% liked)

politics

19170 readers
5286 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Kamala Harris’s political skills have transformed a potentially disastrous 2024 presidential election into a competitive race.

Despite initial skepticism and a challenging campaign, Harris has improved her public image and closed the gap with Trump on key issues. Since Biden stepped aside in July and endorsed her, she has shifted from an unpopular vice president to a viable candidate, even matching Trump in polls on economic issues.

Her leadership has given Democrats a chance to prevent a Trump landslide and halt the rise of American authoritarianism.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 minutes ago

She seems to have lost worse than Hillary...

[–] [email protected] 39 points 4 hours ago (4 children)

Why is no one discussing Dems have lost the senate and given a bigger majority in the house to Republicans. Even without Trump they are bound to control house and the senate.

Stand by for nothing happening for the next 2 years or worse.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 26 minutes ago

I yearn for your optimism.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 hours ago

ABC thinks trumps lead is insurmountable in Penn. This shit is joever.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

Thank that to even heavier Gerrymandering in part, which according to right wingers, is a "leftist conspiracy theory".

[–] hubobes 6 points 4 hours ago

Since Trump seems to win I think a lot of things may happen in the next few years.

[–] BigDanishGuy 44 points 4 hours ago

Did she win? No? Then it doesn't fucking matter!

What? Should she be getting a participation trophy? Sorry, I can't hear you over how Ukraine is being annexed by Russia.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Leave it to the modern journalist to spin a loss as a win. Comedic at best.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 54 minutes ago

Panelist on pbs live election coverage was saying Harris ran a flawless campaign. They just dont get it.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Close, but no cigar does not preserve actual democracy, unfortunately.

Calling yourself a democracy, and being a democracy are two very different things. The first proper word in North Korea's official country name is "Democratic", and bear in mind Russia holds "elections" as well.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

Only a small handfull of countries in the world dont at least claim to be democratic. Heres a map. https://www.reddit.com/r/Maps/comments/1b0md42/countries_that_dont_claim_to_be_democratic/?chainedPosts=t3_1cfr8lx

[–] [email protected] 38 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Edit: If Kamala loses, and it looks like she might, I'm blaming her and her campaign. She could have swooned the beliefs of America if she had ran on something better.

Her political skills are trash.

Kamala gained the most approved points after Biden gave her the race.

Since then, her approval rating has plummeted compared to her early numbers, and I think this is because Kamala doesn't really know what to believe.

You can see it with Tim Walz. There was a lot of momentum when Kamala took up the mantle, and that momentum was carried through once the Walz pick came out. Then, around the DNC, the campaign's tone shifted, crawling back to the ethos of the Biden administration. I think this is because Kamala couldn't decide to break away from Biden or not, and because she waited so long, she was around a lot of the same people in the Biden administration, and those people influenced her platform. You can also see this with marijuana and how she changed sides in her time between being DA and senator. Also, how she didn't really have a solid platform to begin with, which should have been established right when Walz was picked.

I'm not here to call her out as a flip flopper. I'm pointing to how she could have steamrolled this election, but chose not to. It saddened me so much when the campaign had silence Tim for his views and policies when those views and policies were the key to victory.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

It's truly embarrassing as hell to have a Democratic party that can't absolutely crush a clown like Trump. The Democratic establishment isn't just out of touch, it's weak as fuck. Yes, this is on Kamala, but it's also on Obama, and the Clintons, and Pelosi, and Schumer, and the whole "anyone but Bernie" coalition. This is the consequence of running to the center instead of tackling wealth inequality head on.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Maybe this says more about the electorate than the Democratic party.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 51 minutes ago* (last edited 50 minutes ago)

Any cortortion you have to in order to not ask the leadership any questions whatsoever, or question their motivations or strategy even a little bit. You'll go far in corporate life.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 hours ago

That's what 50+ years of neoliberalism does to a population. It's a world wide phenomenon.

[–] [email protected] 89 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

It's honestly unreal that Trump is even in the race, let alone in a position to pull off a possible win. After everything that has happened. I try to keep a positive spirit in general, but it's not easy to be optimistic on behalf of the US right now.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It's not unreal at all. I don't understand why time after time people underestimate what monsters the average American is.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Well, now that it looks like Trump is actually going to pull it off, we're all in for a world of fun over the next four years. We might actually discover just how monstrous things will get.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Four years? You’re awfully optimistic that he’ll ever leave if given power again.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Death

McDonald's kills everything eventually

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

Then it just goes to someone as shitty, but likely much smarter

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

Its a historic win for accelerationists I guess. Viva la revolution.

Sometimes I wonder if the centrists are crypto-accelerationists, because they always run to the center for nonexistent votes like clockwork, and predictably always lose.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 hours ago

America is a fascist country and fascist leadership remains popular among enfranchised residents.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I think the dnc feared a desantis candidate more than they did a trump.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

Harris will be the lightning rod for democract anger, but the DNC are ultimately the ones to blame for allowing the first convicted president.

[–] [email protected] 103 points 12 hours ago (9 children)

I'd argue the opposite.

The fact that Americans are possibly still voting for someone who will bring in the Fourth Reich if elected, over the first female president is a sign of just how badly Democrats have dropped the ball. ESPECIALLY after Jan 6th.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 hours ago

There is an industry built on lies my guy. A literal lie industry. Industrial lies

[–] [email protected] 25 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

It's not the Democrats' fault that there are so many cowardly, weak-minded, brainwashed losers in this country who fall for every bit of propaganda the GOP puts out. Politics shouldn't be about culture wars but that's how the republicans get votes.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 hours ago

It is the Democrats fault that there are so many cowardly, weak-minded losers in charge of the party though.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 hours ago

The Democrats are responsible for 50+ years of neglecting working Americans that created the culture you're complaining about.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 hours ago

You could certainly say the Democrats should have been able to come up with a better outreach plan rather than running the same old plan that hasn't penetrated into this group for the last several elections. It's not as though the culture war nonsense and insane rightwing elements of the party are novel factors, such that the Dems can shrug their collective shoulders and say "Hey, we did our best, be we were flying blind into the unknown."

[–] [email protected] 25 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

I 100% agree except why is it that "Democrats dropped the ball"?

Democrats aren't voting for a fascist. Their politicians are not enabling a fascist. The Democratic voting base hasn't been bamboozled by 30+ years of obvious propaganda pretending to be news.

Christians dropped the ball. Conservative immigrants dropped the ball. Legit news media dropped the ball. Large corporations and wealthy individuals dropped the ball... on purpose.

Democrats work on harm reduction because we don't give them enough votes to make meaningful changes. A 1 or 2 vote margin isn't enough to vote around the moles like Manchin and Sinema.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Christians dropped the ball. Conservative immigrants dropped the ball. Legit news media dropped the ball. Large corporations and wealthy individuals dropped the ball... on purpose.

There is a literal industry built on lies

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

To be fair, just being a corrupt industry full of scumbags is actually progress when it comes to religion. Go back 100 years let alone 500 and it was more like its own authoritarian political party. now it's just hobby lobby with more private jets, and...well, that's a good thing. I don't ever want to have to expect the Spanish inquisition.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

What exactly do you think would have won?

Humans are awful

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Bernie Sanders

Pete Buttigieg

Or if they could have approached a very popular celebrity such as Dwayne Johnson or Taylor Swift and asked them to run.

Even Andrew Yang could have produced a better result if he made a better campaign pitch than focusing his solely on leftist pipe dreams that will bankrupt the country such as UBI.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

~~What's more amazing is that no one is saying "is America ready for a woman president?" this time around, like they were in 2016. It's refreshing, but also sad that it took this long.~~

Never fucking mind. At this point I decide whether suicide or applying for a green card is the easier option.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›