this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
107 points (94.2% liked)

Asklemmy

44152 readers
844 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Please don't think I'm here to complain about rizz or skibidi toilet etc. Thats all fine by me.

The term I dislike strongly is 'eeeh' before you make a statement disagreeing with someone. (This is over text only). Now maybe I've been pavloved bc it's always used by someone disagreeing. But I'm happy with people disagreeing with me normally its just the 'eeeh' or 'erm' that annoys me.

So what's a random term that annoys you?

PS. Saying "eeeh actually 'eeh' is a perfectly fine term" would be a ridiculously easy joke and I will judge you for making it. And I know atleast one person will. Especially bow that I've said all this.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I unreasonably hate the word "moreover". I see no reason why you wouldn't use the words "also", "additionally", or even "furthermore" that sound way better when read.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

People that use question marks in non-question sentences just to be extra snippy and condescending. Fuck that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Every stupid phrase that redditors compulsively say on every thread.

[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

"Completely different" when the two things are actually very similar

[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

Bemused

It's used incorrectly so often that even when I suspect it's being used correctly I can't be sure. At this point its ambiguity makes it a bad word choice.

load more comments (4 replies)
[โ€“] captain_aggravated 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Cleanse. it's a less efficient way to spell clean.

load more comments (3 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

People thinking their clever by making up words that already have a meaning.

"Lawfare" meaning chargingnrich white assholes for the crime they committed

"Disinformatsiya" or however libs spelled it to mean pointing out the hypocrisy of American nationalists.

"Sanewashing" to describe media putting their thumb on the scale for the fascist who wants to cut their taxes.

It implies it's a new phenomenon and not just the current version of whatever propoganda apparatus has been chugging along for decades.

Liberals complain about "sanewashsing" and then in the same breath talk about how cheyney and bush weren't exactly the fucking same as Trump.

[โ€“] pugsnroses77 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

actually huge pet peeve when people write out erm at all. also poor public speaking really bothers me. slow, with "um"s and "so like"s, monotone. really, really makes a work meeting drag by

load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Queer. Not all gay men (the one group I can safely speak about) like to be associated with an ex-slur and its connotations.

load more comments (4 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Calling someone a bot or a shill because they post something you disagree with. It's so stupid. Like even if the person is a bot, would that matter if the point they're making is salient and sourced?

"I don't need to engage with the fact Biden has deported more people than Trump, because you are actually russian. Thus I have no reason to investigate my worldview."????

It's also such a tell. Like the person can't imagine anyone thinking anything other than what they think, so they must not be real people with internal lives. Can't imagine independent thought, literal NPC behaviour.
Especially because it's always the most average of redditor-take-havers that say it.

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Never mind I found it

...took the effort to nvm-d the post, but did not share how, where, or what etc

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

"Oftentimes"

Its always interchangeable with Often. Just use Often.

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

"For me"

I know it's your opinion because you're the one saying it. And the construction of it is just weird. "For" me. I dunno.

[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

on the internet everything is true. therefore if you don't preface your thoughts with "CW: opinion" your writing permanently alters reality and people will be angry at you for inconveniencing them.

imho.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] Cheradenine 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Game Changer, a stupid phrase that is so overused it has become meaningless

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

The exception that proves the rule.

People use it in a way where counterexample proofs that the rule exist when it's supposed to mean that the rule also handles exceptional cases.

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Exspecially

All intensive purposes

Irregardless

I could care less

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ