this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
51 points (93.2% liked)

Space

8773 readers
216 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

πŸ”­ Science

πŸš€ Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Recent unscripted video from Cody Reeder of Cody'sLab.

I don't agree with several of his points, but he raises some interesting issues nonetheless.

Any thoughts on the optimal ways to balance human space exploration with planetary protection?

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] charade_you_are 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Can we send that Tesla guy to Mars? He wants to go and I'm really fucking tired of hearing about him.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Maybe we can send his running mate too, I'm pretty getting tied of the orange man too.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

War: as long as we all live on earth we are very unlikely to destroy the planet in a war.

As soon as we have a second functional planet... Destroying the earth is now a valid military strategy

[–] threelonmusketeers 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

A "functional" independent civilization on Mars is a long way (millennia) off, and not really relevant to the topic of the video. Cody is advocating for a ban on all human Mars missions, even short term research missions. I'm not sure that this is feasible, reasonable, or wise.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Hey, you just described the whole plot of Gundam!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I hope not :'(

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hardly news.

We are effectively an earth limited mammal.

When we go into space, it will be as data.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

Exactly. There is so much cope out there.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Nah, I feel we should let all the billionaires go to Mars. BAI!

[–] PennyRoyal 2 points 1 month ago

I would encourage the use of a stronger term than β€œlet”. The sooner that they can be forced to bootstrap themselves up there en mass, the better. And if their crappy tech fails in them just outside of warranty (space suit warranty limited to Earth orbit, do not expose to harsh conditions/full vacuum/human urine/martian dust. Glass cover not included), well too bad.

[–] Trollivier 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

KtksbaΓ―

If they run out of food out there, they could eat the rich.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

planetary protection is a joke

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Why do you think so? I mean the office at NASA exists with a publicly available description of what it does, do you disagree with having someone be there to oversee adherence to the rules and be responsible for them being adhered to?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Even as fucked as it is, Earth is the cheapest planet in the universe to terraform for human habitation.