786
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 123 points 11 months ago

The biggest thing for me with these two which makes KDE the better DE is that with Gnome I have to change the way I work, with KDE I change it to the way I work. That's what it all boils down to for me.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago

As far as I know there is no intended method for changing the default terminal in Gnome.

100% unacceptable.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

You just described my exact situation. I went back to plasma after using GNOME for 3 weeks.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] masterairmagic 48 points 11 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 46 points 11 months ago

Thats not Gnome. You need to remove the glasses. Hair is not an option. Two eyes, mouth, nose. That's all you get. And you are not allowed to focus on all three, only one at a time can be shown.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I don't know, with Gnome extensions you menage to change anything you'd want to and even more.

Maybe not anything, but the options are there

[-] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

But I don't want third-party extensions, I want a DE that comes with a first-party system tray

[-] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

Ok cool thats what you want, fair enough. We, as in Gnome users, don't mind third party extensions for features we want, and that's also fair enough. Every linux user has the option to use whatever DE/WM they want. This freedom is what we fight for.

We, as in the whole linux community have big enough fights outside our community, the last thing we need is quarrels on the inside. "Yes you can use whatever you want do whatever you want", "Ok cool I'm gonna use this then", "NOO YOU HAVE TO USE THIS ARGHHHGH". It's pathetic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 32 points 11 months ago

It's more like:

OS after ricing

OS before ricing

[-] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago

lmao my KDE is the most rainbow shit evee with candy icons and purple color

[-] [email protected] 25 points 11 months ago
[-] [email protected] 52 points 11 months ago

Agreed. Because I prefer KDE and the goth chick.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

I don't think you have to be goth to like goth chicks

[-] [email protected] 23 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Gnome is the fancy rainbow girl but with useful eyes or mouth. While KDE is the other girl, elegant and customizable and could be a more functional rainbow girl if she so chooses.

(This came out really weirdly but maybe y'all got it anyways)

Edit: I actually meant useless but eh.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

Yes. As a Gnome user is agree.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] vd1n 22 points 11 months ago

Haha, I just tried kde plasma yesterday and went back to dark gloomy serious gnome.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago

Gnome is business casual.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago

OP only ever seen default Garuda KDE I guess.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Ah yes yes. Special snowflakes…

I use Arch btw.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago

I migrated from Kubuntu after 4 years to Debian 12 last month. Default GNOME DE. Yesterday I uninstalled that shit and installed Plasma. GNOME is pretty and shit, but just wasn't for me.

[-] idefix 8 points 11 months ago

Every time I try GNOME I get very confused about what they're training to achieve. I don't like a lot of basic default settings, a story in itself. But the worst part is that they can only be changed via advanced tooling not installed by default (extensions, GNOME tweak). How is that user friendly?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago

Why does Gnome not have tray icons yet! I really don't get it.

I don't want to use extensions.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago
[-] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

Now I extra prefer gnome

[-] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

This made me think of this great early text that mostly had this situation reversed :

http://koplowicz.com/content/kde-vs-gnome-2

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago
[-] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

All these KDE vs. Gnome discussions. I tried them all in a production environment with smb shares WebDAV, caldav etc. I can use them all the way it is usable. But best working from the ground, without to much hassle, is simply gnome.

If someone is new to Linux I would always lead them to gnome.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Am I weird because I like MATE?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
786 points (95.4% liked)

linuxmemes

19849 readers
289 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS