this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
854 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19050 readers
3823 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 145 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Let’s guess which five percent don’t get an increase…

[–] [email protected] 77 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Only 5% of the wealthiest households would come out ahead under Trump’s plans.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Which is his intention.

[–] [email protected] 113 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m still pissed about having to pay more in taxes this year thanks to this moron’s prior “tax cuts.” The fact that this jackass wants normal Americans to pay even more in taxes should be enough to sink his campaign but here we are.

[–] [email protected] 81 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This dude raised my taxes more than any previous administration.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Somehow even more than Bush with his two pointless wars.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Does anyone remember the oppressive taxation of the 1990’s?

No?

We had a budget surplus then, and we created the modern internet.

[–] [email protected] 83 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Trump supporters don't care, they're happy to pay the Trump tax as long as the "right" people are being hurt/killed/displaced

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And they will look at you with a straight face and say how much better the economy was under Trump. They really don't care about any other factors, they will literally attribute any good thing to have been the masterwork of Trump, and anything they don't like is some evil plot by Democrats intentionally structured to hurt them specifically.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

TBF, they constantly hear lies about this by foreign controlled media.

(Fox News)

edit: they are probably naturalized citizens by now, but the point still stands

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

and even to allow homeowners to take unlimited federal deductions for the property taxes they pay to state and local governments.

You could do that before Trump’s 2017 Tax Cuts And Jobs Act. They capped it to punish citydwellers, which are majority Democrat.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago (2 children)

bUt TrUmP iS bEtTeR fOr ThE eCoNoMy

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

Well yeah, it's called trickle down economics. The top 5% are all job creators, they invest in companies. It's not true that the 5% just let their wealth sit there and accumulate on an imaginary score board to beat the next richest person.

It's not like the richest people in the world are hurtling human civilization into a extinction level events to hoard more wealth.

It's not like the rich are looting this country to pad their bank accounts.

The rich are going to use all that money to benefit everyone./s

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

Better for the *Russian economy 🇷🇺

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fucking duh. So you think any of the idiots that will vote for him will bother to read this?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Yeah they still support him after the 2016 tax shitshow that cut taxes for the rich and raised it for everyone else.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, but what if you become rich overnight, it might benefit you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

TBH I don't think it would. I truly believe the rich are voting against their own interests by impoverishing the masses, stripping regulations, and weakening democracy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago
  1. The sarcastic part was that I as an individual would not become rich overnight

  2. Use the /s or be corrected

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Well remember many of them got $1000 bonuses as a reward from their employers for voting Trump, or something.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago

For most of my life I blissfully had no idea who Trump was, as I grew up in the Middle East and not North America. While I did hear his name a few times I had no idea who he was or what he did or anything about him.

But the first time I heard him was back in 2010 when I saw YouTube interviews with Trump I wasn't initially sure of what to make of his proposed tariffs with China (and he was talking about them back then), but after just some thinking (I had just graduated with a Bachelors in business at the time) and more reading I concluded that his idea was bonkers.

Then cracked.com made an entire series of articles that were wildly successful that documented just what a horrific businessman and human being he was. You know on how comments sections anywhere are often highly toxic and conflict ridden? The comments on the Trump articles were actually quite unanimous on how much everyone hated Trump!

I still can't believe that he won and I cannot believe that his presidency was real.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago

We need Musk to swoop in and optimize…haha jk I wouldn’t let either of these jokers clean my golf balls and I don’t even play golf.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Only 95%? You gotta pump those numbers up to 99%, those are rookie numbers.

Peter Thiel or the Heritage Foundation, probably

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

Would the anti-tax lobby be for such massive tax increases? Surely, the anti-tax lobby is made more than 1%ers?

I wish the common American would finally understand how all the wealth just wasting away in a few accounts is such a detriment to this country. From creating lobbying power to underfunding public works; it hurts the people and economy severely. I'm always asked, should a person be punished for making a lot of money... the answer is yes, they should find something more productive to do.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

And if its anything like the last it will still raise the deficit.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

But it would lower it for the most important 5%!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Now, do the correlation between the people who wouldnt have their texes increased with the people who hold most of the national wealth. Hm.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fascism is capitalism in decay Fascism is capitalism in decay Fascism is capitalism in decay Fascism is capitalism in decay

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Daniel Guérin says fascism is the death throes of capitalism (or something like that)

[–] WastingCommentSpace 3 points 1 week ago

I think we need more taxes because we need to be the most on everything. We arent the best country if we arent the most taxed its just a fact.