this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
147 points (96.8% liked)

World News

32187 readers
468 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 49 points 5 days ago (3 children)

So they're now outsourcing production to the West? We've really come full circle.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 5 days ago (35 children)

The difference is that they're not doing it at the expense of hollowing out their domestic industry. They're supplementing their own industry by building additional industry around the world.

load more comments (35 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Why do you assume the West? China often expands to other Asian countries. Or pretend to. E.g. after tariffs are applied to China you'll often see a huge increase in intra Asia trade. Followed by different Asian countries heavily increasing their exports. Usually by hiding the true origin (tariffs are applied to the origin, not some transhipment place).

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago

Also a lot of infrastructure in Africa is being funded in China, their position there is only going to grow stronger.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago

This is what happens with production revolutions. We did the same thing, as did England.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 5 days ago

It'd be really funny if China building factories in Mexico causes NAFTA to collapse.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

And then we have mass worker revolts to seize the means of production in these countries right? Right?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago (12 children)

Woulda been funny. Not just for the obvious benefit of having an uprising and potential revolution in Europe, but also to see how genuine those "red millionaires" are about socialism with Chinese characteristics

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

A bit nitpicky, but the idea behind SWCC isn't that the Capialists in the PRC are "the people's Capitalists" or anything, but that the State as a DotP allows market competition in a controlled manner similar to a birdcage. As these markets form monopolist syndicates, they centralize, and socialize, by which point the CPC increases public owership. Communism is achieved by degree, not by decree. Trying to achieve Communism through fiat has historically resulted in struggles and difficulties.

I recommend reading Socialism Developed China, Not Capitalism for an overview of what that entails.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I also recommend The East is Still Red - Chinese Socialism in the 21st Century by Carlos Martinez, it does a great job of dispelling common myths about China and it's economy, foreign policy, etc with solid sources through a solidly materialist lens.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Pika 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

I'm not sure why we care. It's just simple competition, if your opponent is able to sell a cheaper product, either lower your price or deal with it. It's basic capitalism.

While I'm for tariffs on import to at least make cost equal to minimum wage for workers (to equate for the pay wage differential) if the factories are being built in house, it means they are following country standards including wages, I don't see the issue.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Free market propaganda has never been applied under equal circumstances. It is rhetoric used by capital to reduce or destroy regulations, labor, national sovereignty, etc. Western industrialized capitalist coubtries built their industry and infrastructure using tariffs to protect it, then turned around and demanded the opposite from other countries so that they would have to buy their products and sell whatever those colonizer countries wanted (at the time, usualky raw materials).

Now that other countries are ascendant, US-based "free market" capital is gladly re-embracing protectionist logic. It has only ever been about maximizing their profits. The "theory" of free markets tails capital, it isn't a science or even a valid line of thought.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

And this behavior is somehow sold to the public as a way to boost the economic wellness of the people living under the isolationist programs, but instead it enables profiteering corporations to exert more control over the artificially narrowed market space.

Locking the door with the fox(es) in the henhouse.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

In some cases it has improved public welfare as industrial capital demanded infrastructure and education, though of course they also demanded as much of your day as possible for as little wage as possible. And as finance wins out it acts like a parasite on productivity while still demanding maximum time and minimal wages.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›