this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
347 points (95.3% liked)

politics

18645 readers
3517 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 177 points 1 year ago (6 children)

The Catholic church classified beavers as fish for a while so they could be eaten on Fridays. They may not be experts on taxonomy.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Education is knowing that tomatoes are a fruit. Wisdom is knowing to not put them on a fruit salad.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Perspective is knowing that botanists and dieticians can have different definitions for what fruit is.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why can't they just get their shit together?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I'm gonna use my food wisdom to devise a tomato fruit salad just to spite this comment.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A tomato fruit salad is a salsa

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Unless you simmer it with garlic, herbs, and red wine. Then it's gravy.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

While this has become a popular saying the more interesting portion I found is that science tends to taxonomize by similarity, form and behaviour in isolation. Culture tends to taxonomize by useage and by weight of historical value bias.

Both are valid because their aims are to do entirely different things. One is to make the study of something more efficient and the other is to inform it's everyday instance of use.

However I find it very unnerving when a judge cares only for cultural precedent and not other ethical systems of determining what is just.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Modern taxonomy is based on ancestory. Similarity of form and behavior are ways of assessing ancestory, but they are no longer the basis of the taxonomy itself.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Who dare eat a my precious giant judgy gerbils?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Catholics can only eat the beaver on Fridays? Why would anyone be Catholic?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

No no no, they can eat beaver all week long, they just can't eat anything BUT beaver on Fridays. Scholars maintain that this is the origin of the phrase "Thank God it's Friday". I hope you were not deterred from becoming Catholic due to this misunderstanding.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 118 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

...Chief Justice Roberts’ oft-cited remark that the job of a Supreme Court justice is to “call balls and strikes, and not to pitch or bat.”

The concept of identity-protective cognition helps explain Justice Scalia’s reflexive response to the question of whether fish is meat. Rather than dispassionately considering arguments rooted in biology and social practice, he jumped immediately to his group identity as a practicing Catholic. That identity led him to a clear answer that reflected his group’s moral values and shared commitments: Fish is not meat.

That's the setup and knockdown.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Justice Scalia

Scalia has been dead for 7 years.

All the current shit going on with the SC, and they pick this to write about?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

It's not about Scalia, it's explaining the concept of justices making rulings based on their own identity and beliefs instead of facts and logic. To, you know, explain "All the current shit going on with the SC".

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Fish may or may not be meat, but bumblebees are classified as fish under California law.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep it’s to better protect them as endangered species.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Yeah but its still stupid that they had to do that to get protection.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

"You ain't a fish, sorry can't protect you"

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

See kids, this is why composition is better than inheritance.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

when asked whether they agreed with the statement that members of the opposing party are “not just worse for politics—they are downright evil,” 42 percent of both Republicans and Democrats responded “yes.”

Yikes, that’s a terrifying mentality for 42 percent of people to have, that’s downright ruinous to any attempts to salvage the democratic system.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (6 children)

True, 42% of the population thinking that way seems scary, but half of them are right.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Maybe they should stop having rallies where the crowd spontaneously bursts into chants about how I should be murdered. You know, meet me halfway and stop doing blatantly evil shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I get the need to have a distinction between fish flesh and other meats such as beef, pork, and chicken, but using the same logic as in this article, I've always thought of fish as part of the general "meat" category. It confuses me how Catholics do the "no meat, yes fish" thing. Maybe there's some etymological explanation for why our current-day definition of meat doesn't explicitly have this distinction (assuming it ever did), but if there is, that context seems to have been lost long ago. For some reason, many people now just reflexively believe that fish is not meat -- even non-Catholics.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It has to do with old abstinence laws which stated that meat comes from "land animals" and classified fish as a separate category of creature.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And Kosher laws are absolute insane. Fish must have scales but can't be bottom feeders. Land animals have to have specific types of hooves. Can't mix types of fabric...and other silly stuff that might have had a basis in logic at some point but has been lost.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, as I understand, these were attempts at guidelines for avoiding diseases, because e.g. pork goes bad very quickly.

But we didn't properly figure out how diseases spread until well past the Middle Ages, so that's why they seem to so random...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

Fish is the exception because one of the miracles Jesus performed was to fed a whole mass of people with only 7 loaves of bread, small fish, and turning water into wine. Catholics sort of re-create this in weekly mass and the Pope lets Catholics eat fish during lent. It's just supposed to be symbolic. But religion always forgets what is symbolic and what is reality.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

We are not a very reflexive species.

Pulling out millions of tons of fish from the Oceans is not sustainable. People don't care. If they don't see it, they don't even think about it.

We willfully blind ourselves in any way we can.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (10 children)

When I was a vegetarian I ran into people who thought meat was only beef… so they thought being a vegetarian meant sure, you’d eat pork, lamb, fish, chicken, turkey, just not beef. Kid of a weird thing to think, since for one a chicken is clearly not a vegetable, but also why even bother to make that distinction? “I have a special diet where I don’t eat beef!” and that sounds drastic to them. Some people’s minds are blown by the idea of no animal parts at all, like “What do you eat?

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

And just in case anyone missed the point of his character: he's almost always wrong and an aggressive contrarian by nature. It's celebrated when he's right for that reason specifically.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Chicken of the sea™! Is it Chicken or tuna!?

If you remember, you remember :P

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

The Pope has ALWAYS been wrong.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I really enjoyed reading this article, thank you for sharing it :)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Is fish considered meat?

We’re not sure what this all means for the fish sticks from deep in the freezer aisle, but from a definitions-based perspective, a fish out of water sure appears to be meat.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Okay but is pizza a vegetable?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›