this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
601 points (97.6% liked)

LinkedinLunatics

3707 readers
106 users here now

A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com

(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The whispering is all in her head and says she sucks

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

how many opportunities have you missed

Maybe they should be asking themselves the same questions if they are just ignoring most of the candidates because they are too lazy to get a pdf reader. I'm sure they aren't getting the best people with that approach.

The problem is they expect everyone to jump through hoops for them as if all the candidates are the same and they just need to pick one.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You don't even need a dedicated PDF reader, many (most?) browsers have a PDF reader built-in. You need extra software to see word processor documents, you don't to see a PDF.

If a company is so incompetent that a PDF isn't sufficient (or even preferred), that's not a company I want to deal with anyway.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Reminds me of that greentext about an IT guy for a big business who has absolutely no idea what he's doing and just keeps telling people over the phone to install Adobe Acrobat, about 2 or 3 times a day at most, and 98% of the time it works.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago

Wait, they freely admit that they are incapable of opening 90% of applicants documentation?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago

Apparently it's because a lot of agencies use software that automatically scrapes résumés for keywords that match job descriptions and they don't work very well with PDFs.

This isn't a PEBCAK error for once, and that's very surprising because I've learned the hard way that your average recruiter is a professional spammer that will flood your inbox with shitty roles whilst lacking the mental capacity to understand that entry level doesn't mean 5+ years of experience.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago

looks like that company seriously suffers a huge lack of experts, maybe if you didnt get an answer, just resend your application as a word document with your salary expectation just "tripled" for ... compensation purposes. whatever company still "depends" on microsoft still has heaps extra money it can easily divert to you without any real loss, so don't waste that chance!

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago

She is trolling applicants as hard as she can

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago

Lms "we are incompetent"

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago

chief candidate whisperer

are they looking to hire a horse?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago

This has got to be a shit post or engagement bait...

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (9 children)

Actually this is good advice. Nowadays nobody reads your CV in the first step. Your CV first gets through an automated system (ATS i think its called). It's designed to filter out as much as possible.

The problem with PDF is that it's terrible to parse cuz it's designed for humans reading it, not machines. The only reliable way to parse it is by converting it to images and then OCR, which is kinda expensive.

So before you send a PDF, you should first try to convert it to txt and see if the content make enough sense. Or just use word to make a CV then export to PDF.

When i was looking for a job, i remember there was a website that would give you tips on your CV and they had an ATS report of your CV. I was so shocked to realize that ATS totally messed up completely to parse the correct info from my latex CV. Like I have a lot of AI/ML experience and it completely missed it and thought i had quality assurance one. And i was applying for AI jobs, no wonder I couldn't get any interviews. Then I changed it to word and an exported pdf where word wasn't accepted. I got many more interviews after that.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Alternative suggestion: spray paint your resume on the outside wall of the offices of whatever company you are trying to apply at. Bonus points if you manage an approximate rendition of Comic Sans throughout.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Alternative explanation for why your resume was not read: https://lemmy.world/post/20282317

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Unironically recommended a friend as referral to my job. He was the only person applying, but the company has a policy of needing at least two candidates under consideration for any position.

So they called back another guy who had already been rejected, claimed he was in another round of interviews, used those interviews as the comparison, rejected him as unqualified, and then hired my friend.

Pure nonsense.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›