this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
265 points (99.3% liked)

PC Gaming

8251 readers
554 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you can't play online might as well pirate it

[–] [email protected] 123 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Breaking Linux support after-the-fact ought to be grounds for a full refund (no matter how much time or hours of play have passed). Valve ought to allow such refunds and forcibly debit Rockstar's Steam publisher account, whether Rockstar likes it or not.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago

Same thing happened for the whole Bioshock series. They rolled out the update just over 2 weeks after a big sale so it was beyond the standard refund policy too.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Rockstar doesn't officially support Linux though... So it's on valve that they certified it for steam deck. There's no grounds for charging that back to r*

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I disagree. I bought a game for all the features it had at the time of buying it. There is no avenue for a consumer to push back against publishers changing that

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

While if you bought it, it should be source included and you should be able to host your own servers/pick any patch to play on

We don’t have those consumer protections because software is a relatively new thing

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The first generation of software for early stored-program digital computers in the late 1940s

80 years isn't "new"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

It really wasn’t a consumer constant in the 40s

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

White the other person saying 80 years is a bit much, it has been a constant for at least 40 years now.

Personal computing and software isn't new.

Edit: To clarify, 1984 (40 years ago) saw Superbowl ads for the Apple Macintosh and the advent of the CD-ROM.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

You’ll have people in governments that remember a time without computers

You’ll have some that don’t understand buying is just renting because it wasn’t a thing

Even 30 years is pushing it as a widespread thing for home use 30 years ago would fall into the second group

[–] [email protected] 1 points 26 minutes ago* (last edited 25 minutes ago)

I'll agree that 40 may be a bit too far given some of the real dinosaurs in government. That being said, dating myself here but I have very fond memories of personal computing in the early 90s, even playing games online!

[–] FigMcLargeHuge 17 points 1 day ago

Well they are still selling in-game money without letting anyone know that they possibly cannot use it. But guess what rockstar, if I have to choose between your games and Linux, Linux wins every time. Later...

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

BattleEye can't stop scripting mod hacks in any other game I've ever played using it and that's the number one kind of cheat used in GTA V. 🤦‍♂️

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago

That's super interesting. It would not be the first time Rockstar have put measures in place on GTA Online for them to be completely ineffective.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm glad I never played GTA V for the multiplayer. The load times were enough to make me lose interest.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm not afraid to admit that I played the game a lot and that shit cost me weeks of my life. I'd usually watch MSNBC videos on the second screen while the other one was showing the clouds above LS.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago

I did like the racing in the game but the load time was too unbearable. I think I only logged like three hours into GTA online before I dropped it completely.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Well I wasn't planning on playing GTA 5 but now I guess it'll have to be pirated GTA 5 only so I can play a pre-anticheat version. It sucks that GTA is a game where all the mod developers try hard to make their stuff not work on pirated versions. Guess I'll be avoiding that entire toxic community as a whole. Cyberpunk a better game anyway.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A few months ago, I would be very upset about this, but the game kinda got old a while ago.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

So I wonder what my copy from rockstar will do now, it worked like a week ago under wine(single player). I bought it before it was available on steam unfortunately.

That said gta online was never good so idgaf about that part but Battle eye isnt going to do shit so sucks for those that do care.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

I wonder if online play will actually be tolerable now.