this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
309 points (97.0% liked)

politics

18863 readers
3883 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 75 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Highly doubt there will be a 2nd debate since Harris has already killed him. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] [email protected] 39 points 5 days ago (1 children)

He's awfully noisy for a corpse.

...please don't tell me this a new problem we have to worry about.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 days ago (1 children)

New pandemic just shipped!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago

Actual zombie

[–] [email protected] 60 points 5 days ago

Says the man who immediately wanted another debate with Biden after winning the first one

[–] [email protected] 55 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

There’s no point in debating a pathological liar, especially when a large portion of voters are easily duped and fact checking in real time is sub par and depending on the network, completely nonexistent.

It just acts as a free misinformation/propaganda mass dissemination tool

[–] [email protected] 39 points 5 days ago (2 children)

All day on Twitter the Trumpers have been foaming at the mouth trying to prove "illegals" are eating pets now in the US. Dumbasses.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Either actual room temperature IQ Trumpanzees or Russian bots. 🤖

Twitter (shitter) is a cesspool of misinformation.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Well, it is owned by Trump's wannabe propaganda minister...

[–] vaultdweller013 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The thing thats baffling about musk doing propaganda is it almost feels insulting. Like the right went from Goebbels who more or less wrote the book on propaganda, to Musk who just acts like a child on the internet. Like im glad they have degraded this badly since WW2 but still.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That's also the part I'm glad about. Not to put the Nazis on a pedestal or anything, but propaganda was something they took serious. Now it seems more like the right accidentally hits the notes their followers want to hear.

[–] vaultdweller013 2 points 5 days ago

Yeah, I agree. Still feels like I was promised a fight with a grizzly bear and instead got a black bear instead. Still dangerous regardless but well, though social media is a plague apon mankind which means the average person is also more susceptible. So while not a worthy fight per se its still an annoyingly hard one.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Was just about to comment this too. They just believe it without a single bit of doubt. They're a lost cause. There is no way you can deradicalize these fuckers.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

There are very efficient ways...they're not moral (debatable)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Well, according to Trump, Harris is a Marxist. Are political reeducation camps out of the question? We'll go full Maoist. Anyone caught posting such drivel has to spend a year working on a state-run farm while they receive political reeducation. 🤣

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I want her to do it...the memes from this debate have been spectacular.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

The ideal situation would be for Harris to offer another debate, then for Trump to decline, then for Harris to spend the rest of the campaign taunting Trump for his cowardice. If Trump decides to actually do the debate instead it'll probably end up being a bit of a waste of time, but that would be an acceptable risk.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

There are people who are definitely going to go out and vote for Harris. There are people who are definitely going to go out and vote for Trump.

The debate isn't for these people. It's for the people who are shockingly on the fence about who to vote for, and those who may not vote at all.

The more you get trump on screen being easily manipulated by Harris, the more you make him look weak which will make some of his less ardent supporters less likely to vote, while also convincing others then Harris is the more sane choice.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago

Why would he pass up such a golden opportunity to embarrass her again?

[–] [email protected] 33 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Is DJT a .ml user?

Same debate tactics and I've never seen them both in the same place at once.. just sayin'

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Just got banned from .ml 🫠

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago

Wait... Are the .ml mods the same mods who ran /r/Pyongyang? Anyone seen them in the same place?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I ~~crossed~~ burned that bridge ages ago.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

He's been banned for 14 days.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I believe it was Colbert last night who said that no, she just ripped out his heart, took a big bite, and now wants seconds.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Fake news. He has no heart.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 days ago

“This…… former president…”

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago

While I'd love to see Kamala wipe the floor with him again, I don't think another debate is necessary. At this point Trump's supporters are conditioned to just believe anything he says regardless of accuracy. Not a great idea to give dude more of a platform than he already has.

For me, the number one reason to want another debate is just to give him more chances to out himself as an absolute buffoon.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago

Broken bitch baby

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

He will only commit a second debate if Kamala commits to losing beforehand

Of course, he declared that she lost The second debate before the first debate even began.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

He'll only commit if it's on fox "news" or oann, he gets all his softball questions in advance, and the moderators are his devoted allies who will cut her off at every opportunity

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

He's so old. He's just confused