this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2024
538 points (98.4% liked)

politics

19159 readers
4603 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

There is no denying that white supremacy is an engine of the right.

There are some Republican voters who are sympathetic to their party’s ultranationalist turnand don’t believe the party’s attitudes toward issues such as immigration and crime are the products of racial animus. But over and over again, right-wing leaders and thinkers reveal that white supremacism is an engine of this movement. 

The latest example comes via an episode of “The Tucker Carlson Show” released this week, in which the former Fox News host interviews podcast host and newsletter writer Darryl Cooper. Carlson, arguably the most influential right-wing nationalist commentator in America, said Cooper “may be the best and most honest popular historian in the United States.” But Cooper has made clear that his intellectual project regarding World War II includes Holocaust revisionism.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 98 points 1 month ago (12 children)

It is truly insane to me that the one party in this country has moved into straight-up holocaust denial, but the only thing that will get you labeled an antisemite by either party is suggesting we politely ask Israel to do a little less genocide with the weapons we give them.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I also love the fact that saying we shouldn't allow one semitic group to eradicate another semitic group with our tax payer dollars, makes you antisemitic.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago

Careful buddy, if you keep talking like that, AIPAC is going to give hundreds of thousands of dollars to a Nazi-apologist to take your job.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To be fair both parties are currently engaged in genocide denial.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Well, you're not wrong.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

A holocaust/genocide studies professor once told me there were two categories of holocaust deniers, and while the former were fools, the latter truly scared him:

  1. “It didn’t happen.”

  2. “It wasn’t a holocaust because they didn’t finish the job.

This is veering into #2 territory when you view these deaths as some sort of portion that had “overcrowding.”

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

#2 is what defenders of Israel are saying today too

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Don't know why you're being down voted. "It can't be a genocide there are still Palestinians living in Gaza" is literally a line being used by commenters.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They're the ones down voting it

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

I guess all the downvotes on your comment with no one offering another explanation is probably proof you're right.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You let in the Nazis, you're gonna get Nazi ideology

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You can have a little nazi ideology, as a treat ... no, wait, shit!

Lemmy try another:
Do you want Nazis? Because thats how you get Nazis!

Yeah, there we go.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago (10 children)

Alright, so stay with here....

Cooper also framed the slaughter of millions of people, most of them Jewish, as a logistical failure

The article is spreading Holocaust misinformation too. Most of the victims of the Holocaust were not Jewish.

6 million out of 17 million isn't a majority.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocaust_victims

It's fucking infuriating that so many people keep repeating that bullshit. People legit believe it, it's what we're taught in schools even. But it's just propaganda so kids grow up more likely to excuse Israel's current genocides.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I was taught that it was the largest specific group targeted not that it was the majority.

[–] Zipitydew 14 points 1 month ago

And in this case it's fine for the author to simplify. Because the specifics of the Holocaust isn't the article focus. It's about current day people denying it happened at all and their political affiliation.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Same, but it's the framing of the number that they're calling into question. As if to force people to say "only 6 million of the 17 million," or, "if they're lying about this, what else are they lying about?"

Truly devious and truly maniacal.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

From the linked table, the largest specific group is Soviets.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (9 children)

Holocaust victims were people targeted by the government of Nazi Germany based on their ethnicity, religion, political beliefs, disability or sexual orientation For specified groups like the Jews, genocide was the Nazis' primary goal. According to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (USHMM), the Holocaust was "the systematic, bureaucratic, state-sponsored persecution and murder of six million Jewish men, women and children by the Nazi regime and its collaborators".[1]

Including 7.8 million soviet civilians and POWs in the count kind of seems like a revisionist definition of what the holocaust was to include anyone killed in the war. To undermine how much focus was on the jews pre-war.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

To be fair, the Soviet citizens were targeted because of their ethnicity. Slavics were considered sub human like Jews.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I've always heard the figure being 12 million total. I actually saw an older piece of material recently that mentioned the total as being 11 million.i agree that saying Jews were a majority is incorrect and misleading but I don't think it's intentional misinformation. It was the largest individual group.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago

The racism is just used to distract from the economic issues faced by the middle class, low information voters need to be educated about this.

The republican party is going to destroy America and then their rich will move overseas. You already have TX governors fucking off every time a weather event happens.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] andrew_bidlaw 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Cooper also framed the slaughter of millions of people, most of them Jewish, as a logistical failure. Nazi leader Adolf Hitler, he said, entered Germany into “a war where they were completely unprepared to deal with the millions and millions of prisoners of war, of local political prisoners.”

“They went in with no plan for that and they just threw these people into camps,” he added. “And millions of people ended up dead there.”

Poor little nazis, kek.

That 'historian' is to be bullied from every college debate club.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Also aside from the death camps the Nazis ran executions squads, just lining up and shooting all the villagers once they captured a village.

There is absolutely no question about the Nazis intention of murdering people they thought to be inferior or inconvenient.

[–] andrew_bidlaw 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Their initial approximations how it should go is to clear the Soviet Union from human pests and make germans settle there with slavic genetical garbage as mere servants if not pets allowed to live and reproduce in set margins.

Such a great starting point to treat civilians right.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Hell, not even the fucking Nazis themselves claimed that they weren't deliberately operating death camps. Here's Rudolf Höss, commandant of Auschwitz:

Technically [it] wasn't so hard—it would not have been hard to exterminate even greater numbers.... The killing itself took the least time. You could dispose of 2,000 head in half an hour, but it was the burning that took all the time. The killing was easy; you didn't even need guards to drive them into the chambers; they just went in expecting to take showers and, instead of water, we turned on poison gas. The whole thing went very quickly.

And here he is, after his trial, four days before his execution:

My conscience compels me to make the following declaration. In the solitude of my prison cell, I have come to the bitter recognition that I have sinned gravely against humanity. As Commandant of Auschwitz, I was responsible for carrying out part of the cruel plans of the 'Third Reich' for human destruction. In so doing I have inflicted terrible wounds on humanity. I caused unspeakable suffering for the Polish people in particular. I am to pay for this with my life. May the Lord God forgive one day what I have done. I ask the Polish people for forgiveness. In Polish prisons I experienced for the first time what human kindness is. Despite all that has happened I have experienced humane treatment which I could never have expected, and which has deeply shamed me. May the facts which are now coming out about the horrible crimes against humanity make the repetition of such cruel acts impossible for all time.

Doesn't really sound like the statement of a guy who was trying to claim it didn't fucking happen, or that it was anything but a deliberate crime against humanity.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

They've been called Nazis so much, they have to downplay what the Nazis did (and what they'd like to do). They can't believe they're becoming monsters.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Again?????

Didn't think they'd bring this one back until they released their 'Greatest Shits' album.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Just when you think they can't get more racist

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

This is the same demographic with the Q-anon stuff not shocking. Reality and history isn't their thing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

We already getting another remaster of it?
Why? Haven't the bystanders suffered enough?

I guess the last one with space lasers was pretty wild with flashy CGI, but I can barely keep up with the ridiculous plot - now somehow Palestine is involved, and there is that cartoonishly evil dark Sith Sam thats puppetmastering it all, very directly and obviously, but nobody believes it. It's just so much bs one and can take.

load more comments
view more: next ›