Look, I'm not saying that you're lazy for not spending your nights and weekends at the library taking online learning courses, but you can answer your own question by answering another, "What's stopping you now?" There are fewer barriers to education now than there ever have been. People who are curious learn. People who are driven accomplish. People who are both discover.
this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
56 points (86.8% liked)
No Stupid Questions
35903 readers
1225 users here now
No such thing. Ask away!
!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.
All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.
Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.
If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.
Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.
If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.
Credits
Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!
The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
School isn't just learning the stuff in the classes. It's the shared experience too. It's the teachers holding you accountable for learning.
"Going to school" is a very different thing than just trying to learn on your own. Self motivation and time are a huge barrier for a lot of people. I think the OP was imagining being able to go to school every day and just take classes for free with other people also interested.
I have done my fair share of school. I just think it would be cool to keep learning, but not only that. I think if peoples default was to continually learn stuff and the time allowed to do it wasn't hampered by outside influences we could all engage in much deeper conversations about all sorts of things.
You should never stop learning. School gave you the framework by which you can build new information and knowledge, use it!
Ok but that's not my question....
Some good companies will provide you with paid education, of course it's in form of a training, to an important topic used in that company.
Harvard puts classes online for free, libraries are already paid for through tax dollars and YouTube exists. You can go back to school whenever already friend
As a self learner, knowing this, I'd like to have a word with whomever set requirements for any job requiring a degree.
Probably those who had massive errors happen because people bullshitted their way into a position. Certification is important. It’s impossible to test all the bits of knowledge required for a position every time someone applies for a position with the potential for huge fuckups (doctor, engineer, pilot, etc.)
I don’t want to be in the plane with the self taught pilot, even though I think the requirements in the US are kinda bullshit.
I’m not denying that schools are fleecing students and jobs have some protectionism going on with certifications, but there’s a balance to be struck. These requirements happened for a reason.
I'm a firm believer that as long as you can show you knowledge and can accomplish the job, the piece of paper is unnecessary. It's also why I think apprentiships should be more of a thing again. Degrees are a very modern thing that while a very useful tool, isn't being used right.
Of course, and any job will expect some degree of training anyway. But there's only so much that can be tested for before hiring someone. A degree is just a reference from the university that you meet their standards of mastery at whatever major at whatever level. Some jobs expect you to have one just like some expect you to have references from individuals, but others will have other tests for qualification which may even just be an interview conversation. Apprenticeships are pretty similar; each is an individual or group staking their reputation on vouching for your competency. Even a GED or high school diploma is a reference, just from an organization or a public institution.
Aye, you aren't wrong, that's my whole point though, in the end, it's just one entity vouching for the other. While school can have some standardization I've met enough people from schools with paper in hand that I would never have thought competent enough to weild that paper. So why is this one entity have so much more sway than others? I'm simply saying all the options should be considered and not hard locked off because that paper doesn't exist.
For instance, I have an older family member who's an OG senior program engineer with a resume that is just astoundingly impressive. No doubt most people who've had a computer would recognize their work. Like, sincerely impressive. They struggled to find a job for 4-5 years because they lacked a programming degree.
I don't disagree with degrees as a method, I disagree with using them as a universal, only way method. I, myself, am not a degree weilding graduate but I did work my way up through sheer knowledge. It was a heck of a struggle that took a long, long time. I feel others should be able to do what I did with lower thresholds to jobs if they know their work. Trial periods, internships, contract work, and job competency testing should be reasonable options when hiring, regardless of what entity backs them.
Yeah I actually work in a dev team where about half of us picked up programming outside of college. That includes our boss, who's also the most technically proficient in my opinion. He went through a Microsoft-certified boot camp instead. Some of my uncles are engineers that had college paid for by their company, since they were already shown to be valuable workers without it.
I get the appeal of being able to just look for a candidate's school instead of doing more heavy-lifting when evaluating a candidate, but the growing over-reliance is to everyone's detriment. Companies will be missing out on some real talent, and qualified applicants have trouble getting the opportunity to prove themselves.
A degree shows that you can complete a long-term multi-phase project involving a large variety of tasks and disciplines while following the rules established by the organization.
So can a resume, or work history
All a work history says for lots of jobs is that you followed dress code and showed up. It doesn't mean you accomplished anything.
And it often says nothing about your ability to perform tasks unsupervised or willingness to delay graticifation. Someone working for 4+ years without payment to prepare for the future appears more forward-looking to lots of employers than the person who went to work straight out of high school.
Is it always fair? No. But all else being equal I'll hire someone with a degree every time, so when I have limited time and 300 resumes with only 25 of them have degrees, guess which 275 I'm gonna instantly eliminate?
Sure, you can absolutely do that. That being said, you can literally buy degrees, you can also scrape by and learn nothing and still wind up with a degree. If an adult cant perform their job unsupervised than they aren't a good candidate regardless.
If someone maintains a job it shows that they can at least do what is required to not get fired which means some kind of work performance is done. You can't just show up with a tie and do nothing, if you can than the business itself has problems. My whole point is only that degrees are way overvalued over other means, and you made my exact point. Discounting hundreds of people who could have more direct knowledge on what you're doing over someone who could have never touched a live process because of a piece of paper.
You're just cheating yourself out of good candidates because you feel the process is too hard, which overall hurts the business.
: ( like yeah man just gimme a change for a sec and you'll see I can hang with the big dogs
The degree isn't proof that you know things, but that you can get through a certain set of ordeals.
You can go back to school whenever already friend
The hypothetical included living costs. Which would let you digest those educational resources to learn. Saying they are there without having a system in play is just ignoring the realities of life.
Right, of course I could spend all my spare time learning stuff. What if I was allowed all my time to be spent learning stuff?
The library?
No...
teachers would be really freaking sad with all the people who go only for the free housing
Would they though? Wouldn't they be thrilled to teach things in an open ended, no pressure type environment. It wouldn't have to be structured like it is today. People could learn what ever they are interested in, focus solely on that, and teachers could offer different levels of difficulty based solely on each person's ability.
With free housing, I'm expecting quite a bit of people to be there without interest in learning anything. There is also a lot of pain if the learners aren't filtered into skill levels because you're going to have to "conserve" teacher power so that everyone gets at least one teacher for their subject. A "bright-line" solution to this would be dropping those who don't pass a test after a few weeks, but then you also risk filtering out those who only want to learn a specific subtopic.
That's not the point. The point isn't to force people to learn. The point is eduction is readily available. Sure there might be a person there that doesn't want to do anything but live in their dorm or what ever. Except, there is no obligation for them to learn anything either because school doesn't end.
They could be stuck into a class all about socializing while playing video games. A class about stacking blocks. Whatever.
Then you say, well then how does society work if everyone is dicking around in school. It's not a complete answer but imagine you have all these people who have learned all this very specific stuff according to their interest. What do you think they are going to want to do with it? They will want to apply it.
You're focusing on the education being the value, where the combination of low responsibility plus free room and board may end up being more valuable to some people.
You wouldn't be forcing people to learn, but going to college is a lot more preferable working in fast food or as a janitor.
Am I crazy, people have interests, right? Even the most useless person, given the chance, would be more than willing to explore those interests. History of Marijuana? Cheeto manufacturing?
Those types of classes would probably overfill.
Even the most useless person, given the chance, would be more than willing to explore those interests.
Maybe to a certain extent, but probably not to extent necessary to succeed in college.
A major difference between high school and college is that people choose to be in college; they don't choose to be in high school. Make someone's economic life dependent on college and it switches back to being high school.
And something that you haven't addressed is when people leave. I'm imagining people being more than happy getting stuck in thesis hell for their Masters or Doctorate because it means they still have a roof over their head and food on the table and being a student would be a far better job than a lot of other work out there. There is a reason why all degree programs have a point to try push students out, either via graduation or flunking out.
Masters or doctorate implys they don't need to leave the system. They are contributing. In this world, there is not need for honors or degrees in the same way it is now. Degrees, the way you imply, mean you indend to stop educating yourself and join the workforce. That's not the point. You don't have to stop. That's the point.
This system could work, but there needs to be an incentive to actually learn instead of hogging resources. To create value and not just be a huge budget hole of consumption like OLPC, the incentives should be passing tests for a skill that people can be paid for. Until we institute anarchy, such a project would be doomed to close if there wasn't such an incentive.
(That is, assuming people allow the government to allow people to get free housing by simply learning about the history of weed, which is still banned in many states. Such "interesting" topics also have way more hold within only the neurodivergent community than the masses.)
I'm more just world building here then actually plotting a path to this utopia. Societal needs will always push their way forward but I think there is a level of misappropriation of resources and around education.
The world kind of builds itself, honestly, though.
If society made education our ultimate pursuit answering unanswered questions would be what it's all about. Who would teach them? The people who never leave the system, of course. What if they aren't good teachers? Not every teacher is suited for every student. Structuring classes can be based on learning competencies. Teacher involvement can be based on learning competencies. Ok, but someone needs to run society. Well, we have a population of highly educated individuals.
I think, the more we break down this thought experiment we find that this is actually the natural order. No, not in the form of academia but in the form, what is it called, anthropology? Think to your friend group. Friend groups succeed when they have a unified task. Because each contributor has their own set of experiences each provides new information for the rest.
I don't know. Thanks for humoring me.
It's already like that except the funding part. There's free online learning for basically anything available to everyone in the world, 24/7. And people do take advantage of it.
You can learn whatever TF you want from reliable, trusted sources it's just that all you get from it is the knowledge. You don't normally get a degree or a certificate or anything like that. Because those things are for traditional institutions (and how they make money).
If you really want to learn something, go learn it. What's stopping you?
If you really want to learn something, go learn it. What's stopping you?
Work.
If I don't work full time I can't afford to house or feed myself.
Work wipes me out mentally leaving me no mental bandwidth to spend what precious little time I have left to go learn, even if I want to.
I would love to be able to dedicate time to learning like I did when I was at university but even with the government funding available to me I would have to upend my life.
I do spend time doing learning around things that interest me but it is depressing how little bandwidth work leaves for me to do that.
The issue as I see it is that knowledge in any subject is protean. It changes. So if you wait to long to go back, what you learned before would be completely useless and you'd effectively have to start from the beginning.
Heck, the things I was taught in my Archaeology Degree from 2001 are at best, incomplete, and in some cases, now completely refuted. If I had left and decided to go back even ten years later, the technology that was suddenly in use alone would force me to start all over again.
That is a feature not a bug. The alternative is people being in senior positions that want to do things "the way they were taught to do it" 30 years ago.
Have you considered checking out your local Community College?
I think I was fine with school ending at some point. Focusing on new things... Trading in some annoying obligations for others. I don't think I'd elect to come back unless it's just every now and then.
Yeah, I'm 100% glad to be out of school but as a society we just kinda accept that school should end and then you only do work. Just wish we could reverse that idea. That people who are capable were given more opportunity to explore all the different possibilies this world contains.
How interesting would it be if you and the grocery store clerk could get into a conversation about their dissertation on dark matter or something.
Think, in a future with complete automation why can't this be a possibility?
Agree. I'm not sure if the grocery store clerk will be a human in that scenario and not a robot... But I'd like to live and see humanity arrive at some post-scarcity utopia like Star Trek. Where everyone can choose to do whatever they like, because all the basic needs are met. And all the mundane tasks are done by automation. I'd certainly learn a lot. There are some skills and languages that'd I'd like to try or maybe even master.
Sure, the clerk might be a robot. Just pointing out that even though you might not pursue a career in theoretical physics there might be people who are very interested in it anyway.
Replies in here really showing why teachers are so tragically underpaid 😔
What do you mean ? Tons of people come back to school later in life, and it's ~~often ~~ sometimes funded by unemployment, better giving money to someone for 2 years than for thei rwhole life
A decade or 2 ago? Maybe a ton
Now? This is essentially the truth with the internet
It's already like that except the funding part. There's free online learning for basically anything available to everyone in the world, 24/7. And people do take advantage of it.
You can learn whatever TF you want from reliable, trusted sources it's just that all you get from it is the knowledge. You don't normally get a degree or a certificate or anything like that. Because those things are for traditional institutions (and how they make money).
If you really want to learn something, go learn it. What's stopping you?
That’s how it works now. Assuming you can afford it.
The government would end up housing and educating most of the population, which would cost more than any country could afford.
Everyone would go anti intellectual because of those free loading students