this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024
76 points (85.8% liked)

News

22838 readers
3762 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 40 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The protesters walked directly into a large group of police officials, four officers deep, around 7:30 p.m. The officers began to push them the other way and yelled, “Move back, move back.” Scuffles began to break out, and officers wearing helmets moved into the crowd.

A police supervisor eventually declared it an “unlawful assembly.”

“This is an unpermitted event,” a supervisor declared on a bullhorn. “I am giving you a lawful order to disperse. If you do not disperse, you will be placed into custody by the Chicago Police Department.”

A video showed officials trying to keep photographers and legal observers at bay while officers completed an arrest.

Seems like the police were the ones escalating things.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

CPD classic, I still remember when Lori and them decided to raise the bridges downtown to trap protestors during the George Floyd protests. Then they played disperse messages and hit the protestors at the pinch points. Chicago is a great city but CPD is pretty icky, they even have a blacksite.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

I mean, doesn't everyone in Chicago have a basement? /s

Here's some distressing reading if anyone wants to know more.

https://www.thenation.com/article/culture/lawrence-ralph-torture-letters-review/

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Iirc they did the same thing in NYC. I think there was a lawsuit about it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

Pretty sure cops use this everywhere to violate people's 1st Amendment rights.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Two officers were hurt in the fray,

An undercover cop saw a 31-year-old man chuck a water bottle at another officer. The bottle missed, but the officer was hit with an “unknown liquid,”

How many protesters were "hurt" then?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I'm sorry, media. It's not going to be 1968. It's just not.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

First of all, fuck attacking reporters for just bringing us the fucking news, second of all that's an incredibly fucking low bar to clear.

That said, I do think the Democratic party is handling this a lot better than they've handled dissent previously (e.g. giving the uncommitted delegates a panel to raise awareness about the Palestinian genocide was a step in the right direction), it's just that cops are still prone to doing cop bullshit like this and there's only so much they can do about that.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm not attacking any specific reporters, but you cannot deny that the media has literally spent weeks trying to hype this up as the next 1968.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, actually, I got slightly more angry there than you deserved and wish I had phrased the first part of the last comment differently, I've just got a lot of pent up frustration over seeing a lot of Messenger shooting recently.

But still, I don't think The comparisons to or general discussion about 1968 is any kind of media hype. The fact is, when the Democratic party chooses to hold a convention in Chicago, and there's controversial things going on overseas, and there's a nominee change, that's just way too many parallels for them not to pick up that thread

And it's not like the comparisons to 1968 make the Democratic party look bad, they've come a long way and gotten a lot better. I don't think that should be a determining factor and what the media does or doesn't cover, but still.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

I understand. I probably should have said I wasn't referring to WBEZ specifically, just the overall "let's turn everything into amazing breaking news you have to watch" attitude of this election. It's been like that in previous elections too, but they've been turning it up to 11, hyping up the idea that the DNC will erupt in chaos and violence.

I don't like what is happening here and I'm glad they're reporting it. Heavy-handed police response to protests against genocide is not a good thing. But the media overall is still salivating over the idea that this will end in a massive brawl.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

Even 1968 is overblown. There were more cops there than protesters. It was meant to be a series of concerts, but police violence shut it down almost immediately.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1968_Democratic_National_Convention_protests

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Can you tell CPD that too?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Sorry... you think because this is nowhere near what was happening in 1968, that somehow excuses police actions? How did you even make that connection?

The point is that the media has been spending weeks hyping this up as though it is going to be just as tumultuous and it just hasn't been. They wanted it to be so people would pay attention to the news and they've been pretty much disappointed that it isn't happening. Some of them are angry it isn't happening.

I think you need to go read up on what happened in 1968 at the DNC. It started with the cops murdering a teenager who was protesting. By the end, there were hundreds of people in hospitals.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I’m sorry, media. It’s not going to be 1968.

In 1968 protesters died because CPD killed them. I was drawing a through line from you saying it's not 1968 to the current police violence, and asking those police to not act like the police did at the DNC in 1968

Again Squiddy, you're being defensive and not asking for context but reacting to what you think I said.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You were reacting to something I said because you didn't ask for the context and ended up talking about something other than the media. The thing I was talking about.

I'm sure you won't be defensive about that though.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Wat? I was agreeing with you and made a joke in the spirit of your comment and you attacked me. Look at my other comments in this thread I don't support police violence. Wtf are you talking about?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, I totally attacked you. And I definitely didn't ask for context either. I mean, if I had asked for context, I would have said something like:

Sorry… you think because this is nowhere near what was happening in 1968, that somehow excuses police actions? How did you even make that connection?

And then after that, I would have done something like explain my position. Maybe saying something like:

The point is that the media has been spending weeks hyping this up as though it is going to be just as tumultuous and it just hasn’t been. They wanted it to be so people would pay attention to the news and they’ve been pretty much disappointed that it isn’t happening. Some of them are angry it isn’t happening.

And then finally, I might have tried to explain why I thought you should be more informed:

I think you need to go read up on what happened in 1968 at the DNC. It started with the cops murdering a teenager who was protesting. By the end, there were hundreds of people in hospitals

But no, I just attacked you. You personally, not the things you said. Full-frontal attack with no explanation and no questions.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 weeks ago

This is me going to raise some hell downtown at the Chicago DNC: “wtf?? Cops?!?”