this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
65 points (98.5% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5023 readers
393 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Could moving invasive trees into areas northward help us continue to farm them after we devastated their native habitat?

What is going to happen to the native plants we clearcut to make way for the invasive? Move them more north too?

[–] Justas 2 points 3 weeks ago

In some cases, it's local plants making a return after the invasive ones got killed by climate change. For example, pine trees getting decimated by a pine borer bug all across Europe. In most of those places, they were planted in the 1950s to produce lumber which in turn was used to rebuild all of those destroyed European cities.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Anything, but stopping the use of fossil energy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

I'm fairly sure the climate changes described in the article are going to happen regardless of whether we cut down emissions in the immediate future.

This proposal doesn't seem like it's to "buy more time", but rather to react to warming that's already happened.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Are you suggesting coconuts migrate?!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

Fucking swallows

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

I think it may only work partially, for climate change is not simply the world getting hotter, and the geographic conditions may not suffice.