2315
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 178 points 11 months ago

Just check their comment history for like 30 seconds. Everyone makes a joke that misses the mark every now and then, but the shittiest people usually constantly spew their nonsense.

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] [email protected] 122 points 11 months ago

Just don't punch down. Simple as.

[-] [email protected] 46 points 11 months ago

Dont tell me how to shitpost. If I want extra spicy ill get banned doing it

[-] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago

A person of culture, I see

[-] [email protected] 26 points 11 months ago

What the fuck did you just say about me?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 31 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I only punch interdimensionally. Damn those lazy Gorblecks.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 91 points 11 months ago

The problem is the red ones take the orange ones seriously. Please don't feed the trolls.

[-] [email protected] 90 points 11 months ago

Poe’s Law. Without a sarcasm tag it’s impossible to know if the person is being sarcastic or is that extreme.

[-] [email protected] 30 points 11 months ago

You can always find someone on a social media site who actually holds that belief

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 51 points 11 months ago

The shit posters drive a wedge in a community and the people who don't like the "innocent" jokes leave. This makes fertile ground for ideological take over. Rinse and repeat in Fandoms, subreddits, message boards, etc.

[-] [email protected] 51 points 11 months ago

Respectfully mention that it's kinda insensitive, kinda like, "hey man, don't you think that's kinda insensitive?" and you'll probably figure out fairly quickly which one is the answer. Additionally, if they legit don't know why it's insensitive, then you can educate them!

Just remember that tone can be difficult to convey on the internet, and sometimes you have to exaggerate the intended tone for it to be understood. Additionally, in my experience, asking the question from the other person's perspective ("don't you think that's kinda insensitive" vs "I think that's kinda insensitive") seems to help a lot.

load more comments (33 replies)
[-] [email protected] 50 points 11 months ago

My days on the Opie and Anthony reddit has given me good tone reading.

Fun racism and non fun racism. If it's ugly in tone they're racist. Remember Patrice or maybe Louis ck joking about how "jew" is both the normal term for Jewish people and the slur depending on the tone of how you say it. Reminds me of that but harder to tell with text.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] [email protected] 40 points 11 months ago
[-] [email protected] 36 points 11 months ago

Tbh this is what I love with (uncensored) internet. It’s hard to draw the line between sarcasm and mental illness.

[-] [email protected] 61 points 11 months ago

Yeah but also it enables stuff like Nazi dogwhistling soooo lmao

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[-] [email protected] 35 points 11 months ago
[-] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago

Till you find their collection of feet pics

[-] [email protected] 24 points 11 months ago

Then it helps more

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 24 points 11 months ago

They make crude jokes on the internet?!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 23 points 11 months ago

There is such a thing as a "non-extremist" right-winger?

[-] [email protected] 20 points 11 months ago
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[-] [email protected] 19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The "extremist" part of Right wing "extremist" is meaningless. All reactionary politics are extreme, whether they take the active form of stochastic terror or they take the passive form of social murder (as defined by Engels in 1845, see below). The plausible deniability employed by reactionaries as camouflage among jokes is extremely transparent to anyone familiar enough with it.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago

Shitposters are definitely not innocent.

I would also replace it with trolls because comments in that territory are consistently on or over the line.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
2315 points (97.0% liked)

Memes

44230 readers
1377 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS