this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
237 points (96.8% liked)

politics

18828 readers
6253 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Just over a week after an assassination attempt against Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump resulted in the killing of one bystander and left two people critically injured, a GOP state senator from Ohio was condemned for saying a Democratic victory in November would result in a "civil war."

"I believe wholeheartedly Donald Trump and Butler County's JD Vance are the last chance to save our country, politically," state SEn. George Lang (R-4) said  at a rally for Vance, the first-term U.S. senator from Ohio whom Trump selected as his running mate last week. "I'm afraid if we lose this one, it's going to take a civil war to save the country, and it will be saved."

all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 month ago

Sedition noun : incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority

Also from https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title18/part1/chapter115&edition=prelim

§2385. Advocating overthrow of Government

Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States... Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction

LOCK HIM UP.

[–] xmunk 50 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This person should be arrested, this is just openly anti-democratic.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 month ago (1 children)

People suggest that that the fight against Trump is existential precisely because his side has promised to end democracy rather than accept defeat now or ever. Neither Harris nor Biden has promised anything more revolutionary than incremental progress towards issues like reducing drug prices and rebuilding infrastructure. If they think the boring normal shit is somehow the wrong direction they could simply try running a candidate who isn't a traitor rapist felon in 2028 and NOT promising to build concentration camps or end democracy and see how that plays.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That just doesn't track with their viewers + stakeholders

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Keep going - you're doing great.

Every time the Republicans say the quiet part out loud, we move that much closer to the day when that walking drain clog in a suit gets his flabby ass handed to him at the polls.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

walking drain clog in a suit

JFC man! that is amazing

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

walking drain clog in a suit

Don't you mean sewer clog?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What the ever living fuck. How can these asshats just openly state this and not have some kind of repercussions for it?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

Republican.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Calls for political violence are out of line! Now lets have a civil war!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

And if anyone calls these people Nazis, un-American, etc....then out comes the tone police, lecturing about unity and norms. I saw O'Lielly on Daily Show, acting as if calling Nazis, uh, Nazis is somehow related to a Republican nutjob trying to shoot their orange god-emperor.

The fucking gall of these people, I swear. That is what pisses me off so much.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Good luck with that. Just remember that the military answers to the President and that they own all the tanks.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Drones>tanks

Edit: by this I mean government still wins, but will use drones

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do you think the yokels on mobility scooters are intelligent enough to operate a drone?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

No the government will have hundreds of thousands of drones and can basically take out anyone they want if there was a civil war

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Give it another shot. Our military will follow the Constitution.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

And we have the most powerful military in the world.

[–] agentshags 1 points 1 month ago

Let's hope so

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Ah yes, Ohio, the land of sovereign citizens, home meth labs and civil war larpers.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I love it when the "sovereign citizens" go quoting things like the Constitution, by the way. You mean, from the country you are not part of? It'd be funny if people started deporting them...

[–] Jax 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm still of the opinion sovcits should have their money confiscated

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Fair point.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

As an Ohioan, this jackoff does not speak for all of us. If he truly did, he'd be missing six more teeth, and drinking the fourth of his state-mandated six tall boys per day.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

Yawn, they tried that last time.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

I'd rather KILL than admit my unpopular ideology is being propped up by elections rigged in my own favor yet we still lose.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

if it comes to that point, this time around the police and the army will be ready, so this guy's idiocy will prove fatal to himself.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There won't be a civil war either way. Tech companies could easily tell you who has given violent rhetoric, who has followed it, and who is susceptible to it. If there was open conflict the ring leaders and prospective ring leaders could be known within the week.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Problem is there are far too many fascist sympathizers in our government.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

all right, fine. let's kill the rebel scum all over again. this time, we won't stop. we're going to make Sherman look like a sparkler. there will be nothing left of the south except ashes and regret.

hyperbolic jokes aside, I'm not even PART of "we"; none of my ancestors came here until the 20th century. none of my bloodline was present for the American Civil War.

if that has to change, though, I'm gonna be PISSED, and I'm going to take it out on enemy combatants.

[–] mindbleach 1 points 1 month ago

Do unto others as they would do unto you.