this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
381 points (98.2% liked)

politics

18863 readers
3893 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 94 points 1 month ago

Quietly?

In what way have they been subtle about loudly and proudly proclaiming what everyone else can or cannot do with their body?

[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yes, because it is "quiet" when you feature your hatred of trans people in multiple speeches at your national convention.

They will take away our care, they claim it's about kids, but its not. They just don't think we should be allowed to exist at all.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's quiet because the media don't report on it.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago

Because conservatives own all the major networks now

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

They feel the same way about Teh Ghey, but they realized they more or lost that culture war once gay marriage was the law of the land - at least for now - so they pivoted to focusing on trans like a laser beam. I don't think it is an accident that they started obsessing over where people poop almost right after gay marriage was a done deal.

[–] Ghyste 42 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Quietly? Is this reporter deaf?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hey, I’m deaf and I can feel the noise they’re making about it in my feet

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

The rhythmless and off-tempo stomping from out-of-shape Repub Nazis marching through the streets.

[–] nonentity 18 points 1 month ago

Digging in on the wrong side of history is a core tenet of conservatism.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

Who coulda fuckin predicted

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Since Republicans took control of the House of Representatives last January, GOP lawmakers on Capitol Hill have quietly added a wave of amendments to "must-pass" government funding bills that would ban federal money from being used for gender transition procedures such as hormone therapy and sex reassignment surgery.

"I remember a time when my own medical transition was the only thing going right in my life, and to have it taken away from me would have been existential at least," says Gillian Branstetter, a communications strategist for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)’s LGBTQ and HIV Project.

Meanwhile, West Virginia senator Joe Manchin, who recently left the Democratic Party to become an independent, bizarrely claimed to be unaware that he had voted for a similar pair of amendments – only for his office to reverse course within 24 hours and say he did support them.

Cis women take HRT to mitigate side effects of menopause, or even acne; children receive puberty blockers to prevent premature sexual development; and intersex people undergo genital reconstructive surgery, frequently without their consent in early childhood.

Last year seven out of 12 appropriations bills were amended in the House to restrict trans healthcare, according to a report by the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) – part of a raft of anti-LGBT+ additions ranging from bans on flying Pride flags above federal properties and blocking the enforcement of non-discrimination laws.

In June, House Republicans amended this year’s iteration of the annual National Defence Authorization Act (NDAA) to revoke coverage for trans healthcare under the Pentagon’s sprawling Tricare health insurance program, which serves around 9.6m current and former service members and dependents.


The original article contains 1,771 words, the summary contains 274 words. Saved 85%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!