183
submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to review the case of an Alabama man who has spent decades in prison for a murder conviction supported by recanted and discredited testimony about bite marks.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20240703112202/https://apnews.com/article/bite-marks-supreme-court-6306fb336f625bb171b87188ec647022

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 90 points 4 days ago

Another unsurprising decision by SCOTUS.

Most forensic "science" is bullshit. Bite mark "evidence" is amongst the worst.

I assume polygraph results will be legalized soon.

[-] [email protected] 37 points 4 days ago

Trump bite marks are an official act.

[-] [email protected] 24 points 4 days ago

This just in: conservative justice will use divination to catch the perpetrator.

[-] [email protected] 30 points 4 days ago

Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a statement that the case raises “difficult questions about the adequacy of current postconviction remedies to correct a conviction secured by what we now know was faulty science.”

At least Sotomayor had the decency to comment with a denial, but the rationale is confusing

the constitutional question raised by McCrory has not “percolated sufficiently in the lower courts.” But she urged state and federal lawmakers to establish paths for inmates to challenge “wrongful convictions that rest on repudiated forensic testimony.”

It’s a judicial issue, dealing with evidentiary criteria within courtrooms. How much more ‘in your lane’ does it have to be? If it was challenged to SCotUS on appeal, surely that has “percolated sufficiently in the lower courts.” no?

[-] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

This is just a bullshit ruling. Direct the lower courts to fix it and claim it is a 14th Amendment issue. It is not as if this court gives a fuck what the Amendments actually say, anyway. My suggestion would be a more accurate interpretation of the Constitution than most of the shit they have been legislating from the bench.

[-] DudeImMacGyver 30 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Highlights where the ~~USSC~~ SCOTUS priorities are pretty well I'd say, so much for justice.

[-] [email protected] 26 points 4 days ago

Just a minor nitpick: the acronym is SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States), like POTUS.

[-] DudeImMacGyver 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I've seen both used commonly but ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯ fixed

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

I've seen USSC used like one other time and it was weird. It makes me think of USMC.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

USSC? Union of Soviet Socialist Catboys?

[-] DudeImMacGyver 3 points 4 days ago

They keep trying to seize the means of production and poop in the sandbox, smh my head.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Pretty sure that these ones prefer the memes of reproduction tbh..

[-] DudeImMacGyver 2 points 4 days ago

Close enough.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

This had to exist on Tumblr at some point

this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
183 points (98.4% liked)

News

21741 readers
3372 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS