this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
1206 points (98.1% liked)

World News

39385 readers
2244 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“(With) today’s Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity, that fundamentally changed. For all practical purposes, there are virtually no limits on what the president can do. It’s a fundamentally new principle and it’s a dangerous precedent because the power of the office will no longer be constrained by the law even including the supreme court of the United States.”

Throughout his address, Biden underscored the gravity of the moment, emphasizing that the only barrier to the president’s authority now lies in the personal restraint of the officeholder. He warned vehemently against the prospect of Trump returning to power, painting a stark picture of the dangers such an outcome could pose.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Public: So do something about it.

Biden: I-i-i-if I do that, I'll be a baka.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 months ago

Kill them! Do it!

[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago

Instead of issuing a scathing rebuke shouldn't he just mount a posse and pay them a visit now that he can do whatever he wants?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Gotta say i read that to the tune of "there are no cats in america"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago (4 children)

So, obviously he could just [redacted] the supreme court justices he doesn't like, appoint new ones, and then the only thing congress could do would be to expand the court or whatever, right? but then why couldn't he also just keep killing people in official acts until he gets a bunch of people that are like "yup, that was official and you don't need to do anything about it"? I know that's probably a slippery slope, right and would probably get him a shit ton of public pushback, especially after a certain point, from both conservatives, who predominantly make up the military, and economic power structures, to liberals who would prize decorum and "fair play" above all else (but I repeat myself), and so maybe that leads to a dissolution of society, which maybe leads to an even worse society as the people who control the levers of power are already the most horrible people, but, yadda yadda.

But, I dunno, how many congress people does he have to make go away, before the rest of them start to get the picture and then start to behave in their own self-interest, as they've always behaved? How many people do you really have to threaten in a system where the people who climb to the top are only going to be there out of their own extreme self-interest?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Good for Biden. He is completely right here.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Varyk 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Time to legally immediately replace every Justice except for Sotomayor and Jackson.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago

I never thought I'd say this, but can we channel a little Andrew Jackson energy in regard to the courts?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Biden no longer has the moral high ground to pretend this would be illegal.

Surpreme Court just literally said he can do whatever he wants. Everything he does is legal.

So use those powers to actually want to "save Democracy" if you believe it's truly in danger. Or would that make your carrot disappear of forcing people to vote for you?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

I wonder how long now until the north and south separate. I'm semi facetious, I don't see how this situation can be resolved from this point. The Supreme Court has to go or else this ends one of 2 ways.

If Biden overturned the decision that gave Donald Trump immunity, then the southern republican states would almost certainly rebel. If Donald Trump takes power as a king in January, then the northern Democratic states will almost certainly rebel.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›