this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
329 points (96.9% liked)

News

22625 readers
3636 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This article is just a stub which links to another one with a paywall.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago

https://archive.is/20240701171319/https://www.ft.com/content/ac9fcdd9-a320-403c-b482-ef636312e3cf

Hopefully this works for you, too -- The original article on Financial Times contains a little more info than the Daily Beast version.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (3 children)

"Person who assaulted, charged with assault"

Why is this news?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

Unfortunately if they are moneyed and attacking a prole it is indeed news.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Because the initial assault was news. Generally speaking, news stories with unresolved conclusions tend to release updates when they happen.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The article is terrible. What actually happened? Was his violence actually unprovoked or was it self defense? It says some shit about him being surrounded and liquid thrown on him.

Violence is never appropriate, except in self defense.

If he wasn't defending himself this is probably a hate crime, and he should have the book thrown at him.

Edit ah, the other comment linked article indicates he started things by trading insults with the group. So he walked into the situation.

Fuck what Israel is doing to Palestine. This dude should have just walked away in the first place.

If there is video of them pushing him down and surrounding him, then it'll be a messy case.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I saw a longer video (maybe not the full one) that showed him turning around and engaging with them a couple of times, and someone threw what looked like juice at him - didn't seem to be the bottle, just the liquid, and then he pushed past several people to punch that specific woman. I don't think he can claim self-defense even if they had pushed him down before, because he walked pretty far to get to her without anyone attacking him or even stopping him.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

IF she threw the liquid at him, and he punched her in retaliation, who's actually in the wrong, legal-wise?

Edit: From the downvotes it seems people think I'm defending the guy. I was not, this was an actual question.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Him. Provocation is usually a mitigating factor, but not a complete defense, and it's not like she just randomly threw a drink at him, there was an argument leading to it.

Even when it would be a defense it certainly wouldn't excuse him in this circumstance.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provocation_(law)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Thanks, that's the first I've heard of this legal concept.

It may be ... sufficient to justify an acquittal, a mitigated sentence or a conviction for a lesser charge. ... In extremely rare cases, adequate provocation has resulted in the defendant never being charged with a crime. In one famous example

Though in this case, doesn't throwing a drink at somebody in itself constitute an offense of some sort? Could both parties not be prosecuted? I suppose AG bias might come into play then?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What’s the famous exaaaaammmmmpppple?!

:p

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Buzz Aldrin, punching a flat earther

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

You’re the best!

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If he hadn't assaulted her he might have been able to make her pay his dry cleaning bill.

You can stop pretending to be a JAQing off American, btw. You outed yourself to all the native speakers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I live in Norway, who's pretending? Not my fault if you make assumptions.

If he hadn’t assaulted her he might have been able to make her pay his dry cleaning bill.

Yes? I don't quite get the hostility. I'm curious about the legalities, nothing more.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Here's a hint: stop editorializing when you're JAQing it. Makes it a little obvious.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I honestly have no idea what you're trying to say. I appreciated your 1st explanation. The rest, IDK what's up with it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If someone was advancing on him after that it likely could be legally considered self-defense. But it sounds like he was pushing past people to go attack her. That's not self-defense, that's revenge.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Yeah, it wouldn't be self defense since he wasn't in any danger. Possibly provocation as the other commentor pointed out.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Unlike crossing state lines to get a gun

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Can't you just pull a Rittenhouse? You know always claim self-defense even after waving around a gun and fake cry on the stand?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

From the local news article:

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/woman-hit-in-face-banker-brooklyn-pride-park-slope/5498437/

“We heard him say ‘what a bunch of useful idiots,’” said Micah. “He got about halfway down the block and I turned around and I said, ‘What did you say?’

Don't ever ask someone "what did you say?" if you think they insulted you. You're literally asking to be insulted again and there's no upside.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Why is the person just identified as "banker?" Is that somehow relevant? Are bankers as rage filled as cops and I didn't know about it?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

He’s identified in the article. I think it makes more sense than putting his name in the headline. Nobody knows who “Jonathan whatever” is. We all know what a banker is