this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
329 points (95.8% liked)

World News

38255 readers
2287 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Freed in exchange for a guilty plea in a plea deal

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And time served. Guilty but free.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 month ago (1 children)

One of the most up voted comments on another thread about this was in effect "Assange has been cleared." No, he pleaded guilty and served five years in prison, it's just that he already served that time since he was never released pending trial.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

He probably got a good sentence considering he never stepped foot in a US prison

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

No justice. 👎 Boo, hiss.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

He never denied his guilt. Just disagreed with it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Making sure he pleads guilty to something that isn't a crime equals America not having freedom of speech.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (6 children)

With everything that’s going on in the world, I feel like “freedom of speech” doesn’t exist. It’s just a “buzz”.

Just to name a few things;

  • You want to criticize Israel? Antisemitism!
  • You want to criticize US-related Israel things? Antisemitism!
  • You want to provide evidence of crimes? That’s a ‘crime’!
  • You are against killing innocent people? Antisemitism!
  • You want to protest? You disrupt the order and therefore a crime!

Perhaps it is just me being pessimistic.

[–] n3m37h 8 points 1 month ago

Perhaps it is just me being ~~pessimistic~~ antisemitic.

FIFY!

/S

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

"Freedom of speech" does not protect you from social consequences; it protects you from legal consequences.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

You've just misunderstood what freedom of speech is. The government won't jail you for your opinions. You can say whatever you want that isn't a threat or call to violence.

Let's be real though. That's why people get to call you names when they disagree with you. They also have that same protected speech.

Protesting is a thing you are doing while exercising your free speech. However, you can be doing 2 things at once. Exercising your free speech while committing the crime of trespassing, etc. That one right doesn't make you legally immune to anything else you're doing.

Of course, people commit crimes while protesting to give their protest some teeth, and in some cases to bring attention to the law they might be protesting. But you should be prepared to be fined and arrested during spicy protests. People sitting in the road acting shocked they get hit and dragged away just make me feel like I'm looking at too many shocked Pikachus. You should expect it. That's why you are there. If you didn't face violence you aren't really showing how strongly you feel. That's what it means to stand against opposition.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Don't make me break out my argument about how the bill of rights is a dead letter. Every single one, including the third.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (11 children)

Espionage is 100% a crime. You may disagree with it being a crime but it's illegal in every country.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Worse, it validates the precedent that non-U.S.-citizens can be prosecuted for breaking U.S. law over things they did outside of the U.S.

Really happy that Assange gets to go home, since he's suffered enough personally, but I really don't like the precedent that I can be prosecuted in, say, Israel under Israeli law for things that I did in Wisconsin (e.g. boycotting).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (11 children)

Don't solicit Israeli soldiers to become assets and give you classified information you will then edit to make Israel look as bad as possible?

He acted as a spy in every way.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

There are reports of mass violations being committed against hostages in israeli concentration camps such as the one in the Negev desert. Which is now closed (moved elsewhere) because of all the reports coming out

Are you saying they should arrest the journalists that wrote those reports?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No. There is a massive difference between journalists and Assange. He didn't solicit evidence of crimes. He solicited any and all classified information. Then he straight up edited the stuff he did get to make it look like the US was committing war crimes. He also released diplomatic cables entirely calculated to damage the ability of the US to conduct diplomacy. Finally he straight up interfered in an election by releasing private emails that were hacked by Russian Intelligence. Not one to leave things to chance, he didn't exactly edit them this time. (That backfired hard when the Army just released all the footage and reports) Instead he added editorial titles to email chains he knew no one was really going to dig through. Just enough cover so conservative outlets could run attack ads and articles using his product.

Let me know when the NYT does all of that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Have you even seen collateral murder?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yes, and I've seen the full video and Army reports debunking it. That's why it never went anywhere outside the far left and Russia/China. He had to literally edit the video and create an out of context snuff film before it suited his purposes.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

He wasn't charged for his speech, he was charged for leaking classified information...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

No it was more than that, he actively helped Chelsea hack into files she didn't have access to. He literally hacked into classified databases of the US military. Much worse than leaking info.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

He was not in trouble for leaking information. He literally helped Chelsea hack into classified files she didn't have access to, he actively participated in breaching security inside the US military. Very illegal no matter where you stand.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

This is just blatantly false. Repeating government propaganda doesn't make it true. He did not hack the military he told someone what a VPN is.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Alright it take it back, he tried to help crack a password, but he likely failed. Looks like he was still actively pushing Chelsea to gather more classified info. I'm sorry but this is not the behavior of a journalist

In a pretrial hearing in Manning's case, prosecutors presented evidence that Manning had asked Assange—who was instant messaging with Manning under the name Nathaniel Frank—if he had experience cracking hashes. Assange allegedly responded that he possessed rainbow tables for that, and Manning sent him a hashed password string. According to Thursday's unsealed indictment, Assange followed up two days later asking for more information about the password, and writing that he'd had "no luck so far." The indictment further alleges that Assange actively encouraged Manning to gather even more information, after Manning said she had given all she had.

It's not clear if Assange ever successfully cracked the password. According to the indictment, that password would have given Manning administrative privileges on SIPRNet, allowing her to pull more files from it while concealing the traces of her leaks from investigators.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

You've got a giant nothing burger there don't keep digging deeper.

There's a reason all serious journalists are defending Assagne and describing the case against him as a very dangerous precedent against press freedom.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago

Cool, now do Snowden

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago

Right behind you!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Need a public statement for sure but yea

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

fast forward a few years

"Assange is in critical condition after [near fatal car accident in bumfuck nowhere, mysteriously poisoned, ran off the road, etc.]. Although the incident seems quite suspicious, authorities have already ruled out assassination. If you question this, we will find you."

load more comments
view more: next ›