this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
587 points (99.2% liked)

Damn, that's interesting!

4562 readers
1 users here now

  1. No clickbait
  2. No Racism and Hate speech
  3. No Imgur Gallery Links
  4. No Infographics
  5. Moderator Discretion
  6. Repost Guidelines
  7. No videos over 15 minutes long
  8. No "Photoshopped" posts
  9. Image w/ text posts must be sourced in comments

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You are here

dang, how does it know, that's crazy

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They track your phone idiot

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I leave my devices unvaccinated, thanks

[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 months ago

I always wanted to see this visualized.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 months ago (7 children)

The visualization is strange for this because the hour glass implies that the is a finite number of humans that can live but at the same time it is refilled from the top continously.

What happens in a billion years will it overflow?

Am I the only one with this problem?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Then God will turn it over and it starts going backwards. All the dead people will be born again in reverse order, it's gonna be real weird.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

Phew, luckily religion has all the answers.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What happens in a billion years will it overflow?

They’ll just draw it bigger.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

We’ll just add a zero to each of the population counts.

“Each grain of sand represents 100 million people …”

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Maybe we die out because we failed to take care of the planet.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

More like because we failed to take care of ourselves, by taking care of the biosphere we relied on to stay alive.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Currently our world wide birthrate is trending towards an average of 1.9-2.1 children per woman, which is basically just enough to maintain a stable population. The main reason we exploded in population in the last couple centuries is that our kids stopped dying so frequently, so as people notice that they no longer need to have 15 kids so that 3 of them make it to puberty, they stop having huge families.

[–] SuddenDownpour 3 points 1 month ago

Well. Human societies have an upper limit on the amount of population they can sustain, determined by their access to natural resources, technology, and social organization.

Malthus got a lot of shit because he came up with his theories exactly when civilization was entering into a period where the advancements in technology were drastically expanding those limits, and because his ideas were instrumentalized by a lot of unsavory types, but he did find a (very incomplete) segment of truth.

Right now, the biggest danger of it all becoming relevant again is the possibility that sustained ecological disaster might dramatically lower our population upper limit without us having the capacity to react fast enough.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

The glass will have to become a lot bigger if we start building civilization beyond our little solar system, haha.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

i think it won't be long before we just blow up the whole hourglass with strategic nukes

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

continue to not have any kids

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

But as you see people are producing them at an alarming rate (140 million!) and only 60 million go away. Sad!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Something like 5th uppermost row in the lower part.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

That's a good visual

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What is considered Human here? Homo Sapiens Sapiens?

Anyway, cool graph

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

And Neanderthals

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Flipping it right now

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Kind of makes me think about comparing the very fucking long period of time before agriculture where humans were just monkeying about compared to the shorter period of time afterward with a lot more people and then even the relatively quite fucking short modern period with even so many more people. When you think about the rate of change of human living, for instance, how fast it is now; is that just because there's so many more of us? I mean there's more of us because of things like the agricultural and industrial revolutions, but is it also a bit of a feedback loop? There are perhaps some frightening connotations to that - but to say my actual point, maybe it's appropriate to think about the "amount" of history in human-years rather than just years.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

It’s weird because it means the most common human experience ever will soon include xboxes and doordash.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Homo sapiens?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

About half of people that have ever lived have died

[–] ZombiFrancis 3 points 1 month ago

Technically if estimates are accurate we are all a four-point-something billion old unbroken chain of reproduction.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Interesting visual, crossposting this to [email protected]

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Huh. Didn't think there'd been that many of us already. Neat.

load more comments
view more: next ›