this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
77 points (94.3% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5714 readers
368 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Washington Post recently started asking for an email address in order to access free articles. You can make up any string which starts with a letter, put @gmail.com at the end, and give them that; they don't check that you have access to the email account.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SuddenDownpour 12 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago (2 children)

As I said above:

The Washington Post recently started asking for an email address in order to access free articles. You can make up any string which starts with a letter, put @gmail.com at the end, and give them that; they don’t check that you have access to the email account.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

In that case, you can start posting links to the archive version for people to access instead.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Or you can do minimal effort and just put archive.ph in front of any link to search. There's also 12ft.io which works similarly.

https://archive.ph/https://wapo.st/4clZGnF

https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https://wapo.st/4clZGnF

Providing the canonical links to articles is one of many steps that helps combat misinformation by ensuring the sources of headlines are immediately apparent.

"Astronaut lands on moon, finds it really is made of cheese"

Source: archive.ph/abcdefg

Just scrolling through a feed, is that from a reputable source or some garbage site? Impossible to tell since the source is obfuscated behind an archive link. People don't always read articles and just take the headline and source as a tidbit of information, so having the source apparent at least provides context for the credibility of the headline.

Edit: Ok, the wa.po shortened link does complicate that a bit, but if you copy the full link once it resolves, you can put archive.ph or 12ft.io in front of it and bob's your uncle.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago

It really depends on how much you want to encourage engagement on a post. Ever since forever people have complained that folks in the comments clearly didn't read the article, so when comments complain about a paywall you can A) do what OP did and describe the multiple steps each individual reader can take to access the article or B) link to archive when you make the post in the first place. Commenters complaining of a "paywall" are usually remarking on easy/immediate accessibility, not on whether it's free or not.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Frankly any effort is too much effort to read The Washington Post

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Hmmm, nope.