this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
139 points (96.6% liked)

UK Politics

3950 readers
121 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

HOW IS HE SO BAD AT THIS?

He should've said, 'Look, I was very fortunate growing up, there's no point denying that. What I want is for every child to have the opportunities I had, that's why our policy is to blah, blah first-time buyers blah tax, etc., unlike Labour who want blah VAT on private schools, blah'.

Instead, he gets immediately rattled and starts gibbering at the first follow-up question. He is just the worst.

By the way, this is the interview he thought was so important he had to run away from Normandy to do it. Apparently, it wasn't important enough for him to do any prep.

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm beginning to think he hates the Tory party even more than I do

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I figure he's decided that's he's squirreled away enough graft money and is deliberately trying to get booted from office so he can pull a runner.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Think you mean grift, this ponce has never done a hard day's work in his life.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't forget, he's allowed to claim £115k of UK taxpayers money for the rest of his life after he and Boris dismantled a bunch of the safety nets for UK society.

"Dole for me, not for thee."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd actually be in favour of this if they weren't allowed to take any other jobs afterwards. I reckon doing that removes a bunch of incentives to do nefarious things while in government

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I am also generally in favour of it too, especially reading about world leaders back in the day that went destitute by having to pay for their own security.

It's just ironic that this fund was established for Thatcher, and generally is claimed by PM's who are independently wealthy.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah, it actually is graft, because it's specifically him using his government position to enrich himself, for instance by taking bribes. Grift is the general case of dishonest money, although there's usually a connotation of scam involved.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I mean I'd call bribes dishonest money

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

I mean the Tory members elected fucking Liz Truss over him. He must still have an axe to grind about that.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

It's the only explanation that makes sense.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh noes! I thought this was going to turn around the campaign! My surprise knows no bounds.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is he trying to throw this election?

I mean, I'm delighted that every time he opens his mouth they drop another 3 points in the polls, but I've no fathomable idea how a man can be so utterly useless. It's like he doesn't only not want to be PM any more, but he doesn't want to be official opposition either. Like he just wants to go back to his nice mansion and lie on a big bed of money doing fuck all.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be fair, if those were my options, I certainly wouldn't opt for a life of politics

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Then why doesn't he just resign? Why is he throwing the election intentionally.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Because only plebs give up power! A true aristocrat squanders all options to leave as little as possible behind.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

You'll have to ask him. I can only answer for myself. Happy to do an impromptu AMA on what I would do if I were Sunak

On that note, I would definitely resign today.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Do you think he does mock interviews or does he just refuse to do them.

I cannot decide if he does mock interviews and everyone on his staff is such an idiot that they can't come up with obvious questions like this, or if he just refuses to do them because he's arrogant.

I'm inclined to think it may very well be the former because the whole administration just seems to be pathologically incompetent. For all his faults, and they were many, at least Cameron's administration probably could organize a piss-up in a brewery.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cameron was the last PM who actually got things done. They were bad things, sure, but he did do them.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Now now, Boris got brexit done. It ended up being a complete pig’s ear, quite possibly from the same pig Cameron was acquainted with, but it did get done.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I was considering whether to mention that and I think on balance you're right that it did Get Done and I should have included it. Mea culpa. In my defence, it was world-historically shit.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sounds like an Onion headline

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why do you need Sky TV? Freeview ought to be enough for everyone.

Hell, I'm not didn't in the UK and I enjoyed CBBC. I can't remember how I got access to it (because geoblocking, which is bullshit), but I liked it. I can't say the same about news programming because fuck that amirite?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He's older than Freeview. He'd only have had four channels, the poor soul.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They still had some cool stuff I'm sure.

Also, wasn't CBBC a programming block during this time as well?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Now, you mention it, I do remember that. They used to do Marvel Hour on Saturday, with the X Men show. It was the tits.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I wasn't around for that stuff and I kinda wish I was.

But even then, I wasn't in the UK anyway.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

during my childhood, you needed sky to watch stuff like nickelodeon and CN. shit was mad expensive, basicallv useless in the rain and had ads. It was awful

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

That's why you made friends with someone who had it. Then you went around their house and ate wagon wheels and watched Totally Spies, and felt things.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Sad. We had free to air versions of those on satellite (although Nick closed in 2011 for... honestly I have no idea why they closed it down)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

The rate at which Rich-i keeps showing his foot deep into his mouth makes me admire his dexterity and flexibility.