this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2024
211 points (94.1% liked)

Privacy

4272 readers
83 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 48 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Oh no who would have guessed that screenshoting and saving them unencrypted in an unprotected area in where confidential screenshots with passwords can be grabbed by any script kiddie.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 5 months ago

Even if we ignore the security issues (and we shouldn't) why the hell would I want my computer taking screenshots, writing that to disk and running OCR on the image, writing results to a database and creating correlations EVERY FEW SECONDS! That's a huge amount of bloat. I want my computer to be quick and responsive.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

It’s not like people deserve any sense of privacy, their passwords should be public knowledge.

If you have done nothing wrong, you shouldn’t have anything to hide (said every authoritarian asshat ever)

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Correction: they are encrypted. Not well, but cut them some slack, it's a small startup.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No they arent. They are obfuscated at best. The images are just saved without .jpg extension, and slapping one behind is enough

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's encrypted, but at the same level as everything else the user has access to. So, if your computer is stolen and they can't log in, they can't access it.

Basically, encrypted, just like any other user file.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think you forgot to mention if the hard drive is encrypted than your statement is true ( in the case for example bitlocker...) but if thats not the case then anyone can just force permissions for that drive and read and write anything.

Bitlokcer would be default active on new windows 11 devices if they all had tpm 2.0 chips ( most of the windows 10 users dont have that featzre ) so bitlocker is out of that case.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The drive is encrypted on W11, if you tamper with the install to allow non TPM requirement then I don't think you can blame anybody if there are consequences. You can install a random exe from the internet, give it admin rights too, that's also on you.

This is a shit show already, no need to make things up to make it worse really.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Still tpm 2.0 should never be required in the first place. But yeah windows is already a shitshow

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Please, give them some credit where it's due and don't be so hard on them. You'd have to be technically sound and computer experts to have that kind of foresight!

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Anyone who cared to pay attention knows that Microsoft has been reaping your data for years under the guise of “telemetry”, “product improvement” and the requirement of a Microsoft account just to set up a local operating system. This time they thought they could add the spying cloaked as a feature. Microsoft hasn’t had a clue when it comes to innovation or usefulness for two decades. It’s just a front for shareholders these days.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Do you have a few minutes to talk about our Lord and Saviour, Linus Torvalds?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Something something Richard Stallman something.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This picture of rms comes to mind whenever I or someone evangelizes Linux in a Windows thread:

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

That picture is as old as RMS

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago

I'm actually surprised nobody thought to say "Microsoft recalls Windows recall".

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago

Heh. No. They lost my trust years ago.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

Sadly a lot of people can't just ditch windows due to various reasons out of there control. Microcrap is so good embedded with this society that they can do shit like this and not take a hit.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

To help anyone dealing with Ms crap -

get Win10 LTSC. It gets updates 2x/year, has very minimal bloat. (Or Win11 LTSC if that's what you want).

Then get O&O Shutup to reduce bloat even more.

And you can permanently license it using Microsoft's own scripts.

Scripts on Gituub.

There are some tools to ensure Recall is fully un-installed and blocked. Group Policy will definitely prevent it from ever running, and LTSC is a Pro version, so Group Policy functions properly.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Just going linux is way easier

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Keyboard drivers need some work though

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Do you have examples of issues? The only hardware incompatibilities I've ever experienced were with my VR headset.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

I never head a keyboard issue on linux can you elaborate?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

It took Recall to wake them up? Holy shit.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

looks like they would need to conduct an actual windows recall, now.

[–] iterable 3 points 5 months ago

Microsoft became the perfect scapegoat for any level zero anti cheat to point at.