this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
423 points (99.3% liked)

UK Politics

3145 readers
6 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 80 points 1 year ago

You know he is going to swan off to the USA as soon as he looses the election. There will be a reason he will not investigate the tax fraud that the audit office said was happening. The people of Uxbridge should be ashamed of what they voted back. He is piggy backing on their ignorance to make money for his family.

[–] [email protected] 75 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Indian IT company is owned by the prime minister’s wife’s family although Sunak has insisted the matter is of “no legitimate public interest”.

Yes sir. None of beeswax, m'lud. Understood.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Infosys is an IT equivalent of sweatshops.

[–] progdoggy 57 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pathetic. Medieval kings had more fear of the peasants revolting than these corrupt bastards do now. Way past time we re-instilled that fear.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Peasants could match the medieval Kings of Europe in a lot of ways. The force Kings could apply without using peasants was limited to knights that were dispersed across the country and a small number of professional guards/soldiers. The weapons these forces used were more powerful than the peasants but could be overcome through sheer numbers. If the peasants withheld their labour, the Kings would starve and the kingdom would fall apart.

Most states now have a large professional police force and military that is extremely well equipped with weapons and intelligence that modern peasantry cannot come close to matching. These forces are mobile enough to deploy rapidly throughout the jurisdiction. And the labour of the peasants has largely been offshored or supplanted with temporary foreign work.

Kings were right to fear peasants in the past because the peasants represented a credible threat. This is no longer the case in the modern world. We are entirely at the mercy of those in power to play by our imaginary rules for democracy. If those in power choose to ignore those rules, the rest of us peasants have very little effective recourse.

[–] progdoggy 16 points 1 year ago

The pandemic showed we just have to stop going to work in great enough numbers. I know it’s a pipe dream, we’re too divided, there’s too many that would betray their class, etc etc., but theoretically we do have recourse. Even mass unionization would help.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There should be a limit on how corrupt one party can be.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Historically, there certainly have been such limits, but enforcement of them required involving a rather large group of people with some combination of torches, molotov cocktails, pitchforks, swords/knives tar, feathers, guns, ropes, and guillotines.

They got a bit messy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Care for a game of how many uses of a guillotine it takes for politicians to listen?

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The next tory crime family

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Crime?!? These are perfectly legal deals. Knowledge is power and everyone's going to die anyway. The man is simply providing for his poor family while he has some power. It's not his fault if these IT surveillance people happen to peek at his documents (heavy /s)

It's scary how much knowledge these folks have access to...

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

They're like robber barons who know their time is up so they are grabbing what they can for themselves and their mates while burning the place down.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] snota 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How do you get them to put rules in place that stop them from being corrupt. It's a crappy downward slope.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

The French had a good solution.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

I believe it's called marching in the streets (explosive devices optional) until they remember who their powers come from.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Crooks, crooks… Whether it’s in the UK, France, Canada, US and etc. these crooks are everywhere. Surely these fine people must attend some kind of monthly get together and devise a strategy on how to feed shit and bollocks to the common folks.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I'm shocked! A billionaire politician -- corrupt! Who would have thought!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Shocker! /s

load more comments
view more: next ›