this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
-88 points (8.5% liked)

politics

18651 readers
4158 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 months ago (1 children)

God I hate sites like the dailybeast. The qoute in the article is "And when I was vice president, things were kind of bad during the pandemic". However, Biden was VP during a pandemic - Swine Flu Pandemic. I wouldn't be surprised if he made a gaffe like this, but their own article doesn't support the headline.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, the gaffe is just not recognizing that "the pandemic" means COVD now, not "whichever pandemic was happening when my story takes place". Not a good sign for the sharpness of the old presidential noggin, but not "lost in time and jumbling events".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Man this quote will be Even worse after covid-34

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The latter is his opponent.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 months ago (2 children)

What a completely bullshit article. Yes, there was a pandemic during Obama's presidency - swine flu - and though it wasn't as bad as COVID, it was bad and we were worried it would be worse. So the administration created a pandemic playbook, which was left in place for Trump. Of course, Trump ignored it and even disbanded offices that formed a part of the response team.

So Biden was completely accurate and it's The Daily Beast who has memory issues, not him.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

You've already lost. The poster is intentionally spreading misinformation. What matters is that the headline gets read, the association that Biden is incompetent gets triggered, and a voter sits out or votes for the other guy by default when the time comes.

A fact-filled refutation only matters if the reader cares about facts and will adjust their views based on them. But the target audience of the article couldn't care less.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Biden then said, “And what happened was, Barack said to me, ‘Go to Detroit, and help fix it.’" This is way too deep in the nettles for me to remember or even google; do you have any idea whether that trip to Detroit was about the pandemic, or (like TBD seems to think) about the recession?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago

At least this time he remembered Obama's name