119
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 60 points 2 months ago

Yes there is FUD around signal. But they are not offering any better solutions.

Signal has some structural issues, and isn't a good solution for all threat models (i.e. if your a government who doesn't fully trust the USA, then signal isn't for you)

Any conversation that doesn't talk about briar, simplex, etc is deeply flawed since only they attempt to address the fundamental structural issues with signal.

Don't use that centralized chat service, use THIS centralized chat service - is just FUD... and isn't a helpful conversation.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Don't use a centralized chat service. Use a decentralized chat service. XMPP uses the same encryption for it's e2e encryption, is decentralized, and super light weight for both the server and the client.

[-] [email protected] 35 points 2 months ago

And "super easy" to use. To get your friend onto it, first you have to host a server, then they have to install a client with an interface from the 90s, activate the XEPs for encryption on their client and ensure the server supports it too, exchange usernames, create an encrypted connection and exchange random codes over another medium to ensure you're talking to the right person.

NOW you can start chatting with the other person and hope the server doesn't crash. ECPC

Anti Commercial-AI license

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Or, you can skip the unhinged rant, use monocles or dino, and a public server.

Also, hosting a server is much simpler than something like matrix. You can host an xmpp server on a pi and that is more than enough. Or, just use a public server.

So difficult.

I like how you included steps that absolutely aren't required and haven't been for like a decade to make your statement more hyperbolic.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

if your a government who doesn’t fully trust the USA, then signal isn’t for you

how? i tought it was e2ee and open source?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago
[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

The security of your key is determined by the strength of your passphrase. Am I missing something?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

https://hackertalks.com/comment/3441244

Uploading your private key to the cloud is a very risky thing to do regardless of your threat model. And there are many threat models that absolutely cannot do that. So it is worth indicating as one of the weaknesses of signal

[-] Scolding0513 2 points 2 months ago

the best answer

[-] [email protected] 51 points 2 months ago

Telegram isnt really e2ee so he wants to champion the less secure option. Gee, I wonder why?????

[-] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago

Its Russian founder recently praised Musk in an interview for Tucker Carlson.

[-] fruitycoder 7 points 2 months ago

Is narcissistic disorder a prereq to be a billionaire or is it just a common symptom of having too much wealth for some.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yeah sort of. I think those types of disorders get rewarded in many cases. It's exceptionally profitable to exploit labor, mislead the public, and plunder the planet. When you have a conscience and empathy, that's a lot harder to do, especially if you already enjoy a certain level of financial security.

[-] [email protected] 43 points 2 months ago

telegram is the real FUD here. its closed, not encrypted by default and all messages go through a centralized server.

[-] [email protected] 37 points 2 months ago

I don't think it has anything to do with the "right wingers." I think many people and governments seek to discredit anything they can not control. Its basic misinformation tactics.

As far as Elon goes, he says crazy things and shouldn't be believed.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Talks about other people creating FUD, then links to a post asserting telegram is compromised without citing any sources about anything discussed in the post. 🙄 FUD indeed.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

I'm not saying it's broken, but it has some design choices and functions that makes even Whatsapp a better choice for privacy minded people. Like rolling their own crypto and not having e2ee as default.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Anti-libre software, WhatsApp, bans us from proving it has E2EE, bans us from proving any of its claims and bans us from removing malicious source code.

[-] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Telegram is Service as a Software Substitute (proof app needs service and we are missing server software for it: broken app).

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

When do they not spread FUD?

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It think there are a lot of factors at play. Musk wants Twitter* to be an everything app and has mentioned plans to add e2e encryption to the dms. Telegram already had an iffy relationship to people who look for encrypted platforms so he probably wants to set up that idea to get people onto Twitter instead, especially as the right's relationship to the platform is absolutely getting worse.

A big chunk of far right Telegram has moved off the platform recently after quite a few of the groups that got their start from anti-lockdown demos had members get arrested for terror charges. They seem to blame the fact that Telegram is backdoored but they constantly fed-post in open unencrypted channels anyone can read anyway. The police probably do monitor those channels but if I were to guess how they got caught, my bet is honestly that they just put in reports to the cops about each other because being fascists usually goes hand in hand with being horrible people.

I'm not sure how much he actually reads on far right Telegram but there is evidence of him at least following some channels where this sentiment can be seen. If I were to guess he saw oppotunity in bringing that audience back to Twitter.

* I refuse to call it X

EDIT: fix early accidental submission

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago
[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Yes, "because one of their council is leftist pro censorship"

Like this crap

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

Like this crap

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] Outtatime 1 points 2 months ago

Now this community is going political? Lovely. I come here to look at discussions about privacy related stuff not political stuff

this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
119 points (84.4% liked)

Privacy

30011 readers
1317 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS