683
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 121 points 11 months ago

If people survided it would be unfair for the people who already died

[-] [email protected] 33 points 11 months ago

That's the spirit

[-] [email protected] 71 points 11 months ago

Good thing that most people tend to judge you for killing a given finite number of people, rather than based on the percentage of the population. That is to say, If you kill one random person in China, you're generally considered just as much a murderer as if you kill one random person in Luxembourg

[-] [email protected] 31 points 11 months ago

But the Luxembourger deserved it

[-] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago

And if you kill 30% of the population of the world you get hailed as a great conqueror.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

To be fair, you subcontract a lot of the work out if that's the case!

[-] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

I'm not sure if that's necessarily true. For one thing, thanks to ✨racism✨, who you kill will influence how you're viewed. And if you kill enough people, I think it often causes people to view the event less personally ("one person is a tragedy, a million is a statistic"). Of course, that also depends on how you kill them. Killing one innocent looking civilian with a trolley will go over a lot worse than sending a million soldiers to die in a war (no matter how pointless or wrong the war was).

[-] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago
[-] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago

And killing a Chinese isn't as bad as killing someone from Beijing

[-] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

is Beijing not in China now

[-] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

That's the joke. You can take any person and zoom in and out at will to make it better or worse

[-] [email protected] 43 points 11 months ago

Also the trolley is how you get to work, so if you stop it you can't get to work and pay your rent so

[-] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

think of all the jobs that would be lost if the trolley were to stop

[-] [email protected] 33 points 11 months ago

Can the last person sue me for stopping the train if they become injured?

[-] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

Not if the injury makes them comatose.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

You didn't save my life You ruined my death!

[-] [email protected] 27 points 11 months ago

I pause to wonder the manufacture of the trolley, seeing as it should have derailed by now, causing an end to the death. Yet, it continues its eternal murderous journey.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

Rack-and-pinion? Might clog though

[-] [email protected] 19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The whole 0% thing works best if you aren't aware of how far the train has already gone.

So you can't weigh any past quantity dead on any theoretical 0% future

[-] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago

If I let the trolley go indefinitely, will it eventually kill the infinite amount of people?

[-] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

No, it just keeps going indefinitely.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

It's rolling through Hilbert's Hotel

[-] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago

As long as the lever is pulled before I die, then it will be about 0%. But if I die before I pull the lever, and no one else pulls the lever, then it will go on for an infinite amount of time and kill all of them

[-] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

So, to make sure that you can meet all of them in the afterlife, you must not pull the lever. If you do then they'll live forever.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

There is no afterlife. You reincarnate as the last person tied to the tracks. That’s how they make it infinite.

[-] feck_it 4 points 11 months ago

There is no hell, only tracks which you are tied.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago

“Effective” “altruism” be like

[-] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

The obvious response is to stop the trolley. Regardless of the percentage, people will continue to die if you don't. The perspective doesn't matter, the fact is there are people ahead who are alive.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

This right here is what it boils down to when someone responds to a wrongful killing by police with a questionable statistic about how it's only a tiny fraction of interactions that end that way.

[-] norawibb 7 points 11 months ago

deaths per time

[-] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

what if the number of people on the tracks is “infinite in both directions”? eg the trolley “starts at” -∞?

[-] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

That's still the same size of infinity. Infinities are strange. But you can rearrange -∞ to ∞ to be the same size as 0 to ∞. You can do this by moving the negative numbers alongside their positive counterpart, like so:

0, 1, -1, 2, -2, 3, -3, etc.

This infinity is still a countable infinity, same as

0, 1, 2, 3, etc.

So it makes no difference whether you start at 0 or -∞

[-] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

very true that infinities are strange. while starting at -∞ would not affect the cardinality, it would change the scenario.

we can think about starting at -∞ as counting the trolleys position using the integers, and we can think about starting at 0 as using the natural number to count the trolleys position. for example, the integer n would correspond to the trolley being on top of the n-th person. here we assume the trolley is moving to the right so the position increases as time passes. (if we change the setup so the trolley moves to the left, then it is possible that the trolley kills everyone in the second original setup but not the modified version.)

in the original setup, regardless of the trolleys position, the trolley would have killed finitely many people. (for any integer n, there are only finitely many nonnegative integers less than n). in the modified setup however, at any position, the trolley would have killed infinitely many people. (for any integer n, there are infinitely many integers less than n.) it’s a subtle difference but it does impact the scenario.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago
[-] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

no i just have a decent background in pure math

[-] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Your post kinda reads like a chatgpt response with a few human touches added

[-] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago
[-] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Fair enough

[-] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

yeah, but if it starts at -inf and I start at 0 then I don't have to look at the horrible things I'm allowing to happen

[-] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

Also Think of the consequences of suddenly adding infinite people to the population

[-] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

yeah that may cause a few problems. there would also need to be an infinite amount of trolley track which may pose some infrastructure challenges

[-] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Can I make it accelerate forever?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

yes, but that only means it'll get closer and closer to c.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

Can you C what I'm saying? And then my shoes started to queek.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Also, that is a LOT of pants!

[-] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Did anyone else misread this as the rail being densely filled with humans (for every a,b in R, a < b, there are infinitely many humans in (a,b))?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
683 points (97.5% liked)

Memes

7851 readers
1393 users here now

Post memes here.

A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme.

An Internet meme or meme, is a cultural item that is spread via the Internet, often through social media platforms. The name is by the concept of memes proposed by Richard Dawkins in 1972. Internet memes can take various forms, such as images, videos, GIFs, and various other viral sensations.


Laittakaa meemejä tänne.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS